You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.S. Retreats as Russians Advance in the Persian Gulf ... Or is this a Strategic Re-positioning in Advance of Hostilities?
2015-10-12

The following is an article published by Press TV and verified by NBC News. There are a few ways to take the re-positioning of the USS Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group.

1. As they say - Scheduled maintenance - But I find this a little too coincidental.

2. Retreating to allow Russia full play in the Gulf. Nah.

3. Moving to a strategic position in preparation of an order for hostilities against Russia. Bingo.

The aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), commanded by Capt. Daniel Grieco, is joined with the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60), and the guided-missile destroyers USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81) and USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98), while the guided-missile destroyer USS Farragut (DDG 99).

Commanded by Rear Adm. Andrew "Woody" Lewis, Carrier Strike Group 12 also includes Destroyer Squadron 2 and nine embarked aircraft squadrons of Carrier Air Wing 1: strike fighter squadrons VFA-11 "Red Rippers," VMFA-251 "Thunderbolts," VFA-136 "Knighthawks," and VFA-211 "Checkmates;" electronic attack squadron VAQ-137 "Rooks;" carrier airborne early warning squadron VAW-125 "Tigertails;" fleet logistics support squadron VRC-40 "Rawhides;" helicopter maritime strike squadron HSM-46 "Grandmasters;" and helicopter sea combat squadron HS-11 "Dragonslayers."Call Sign for the Roosevelt is "Rough Rider".

Press TV - The United States has pulled the USS Theodore Roosevelt -- a massive, nuclear-powered aircraft carrier -- out of the Persian Gulf as Russian warships have entered the area.

For the first time since 2007, the US Navy has now no aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.

The warship was withdrawn from the Persian Gulf on Thursday, a day after Russia fired 26 long-range cruise missiles from its Caspian Flotilla against terrorists in Syria, Pentagon officials said.

US military officials claimed that the aircraft carrier, which houses about 5,000 sailors and 65 fighter jets, was withdrawn because it needed to undergo maintenance.

Tensions between the United States and Russia escalated after Moscow began its military campaign on September 30 against Daesh (ISIL) terrorists wreaking havoc in Syria.

Russia has carried out more than 110 airstrikes against terrorists in Syria so far, killing hundreds of militants.

The Pentagon announced on Wednesday that the United States had adopted measures to ensure a safe distance from Russian fighter jets flying over Syria.

Republican Senator John McCain, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on Thursday that Washington should "just leave" Syria "if all of your [US] actions are dictated by the risk of confrontation with Russia."

Peter Daly, a retired Navy vice admiral, noted that the absence of a US aircraft carrier is being noticed by Russians.

"The most important thing you need a carrier for is for what you don't know is going to happen next," Daly told NBC News.

Three unnamed US military officials claimed on Thursday that some cruise missiles fired from Russian ships at targets in Syria landed in Iran.


Russian navy ship launches a cruise missile in the Caspian Sea on Wednesday. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service)
The officials stated that four Russian cruise missiles went off course and crashed in Iran, adding that they don't know if the errant missiles caused any damage.

Iranian Officials were unaware of any reported explosions on their territory.

In response, the Russian Defense Ministry statement said that the new Kalibr-NK cruise missiles all struck within nine feet of their intended targets in Syria.

"No matter how unpleasant and unexpected it is for our colleagues in the Pentagon and Langley, our strike yesterday with precision-guided weapons at ISIS (Daesh/ISIL) infrastructure in Syria hit its targets," the Russian Defense Ministry spokesman said on Thursday.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#13  As per CHINA = NOT-RUSSIA = NOT-IRAN ...

* FREEREPUBLIC > [Zero Hedge = WSJ] US PATROLS TO TEST CHINA'S RESOLVE ON SOUTH SEA ISLANDS [SCS], "A MATTER OF TIME" [Days?] AS TO WHEN OPERATIONS WILL START DESPITE XI JINPING'S SURPRISE COMITMENT IN WASHINGTON [China to NOT Militarize the Islands] + OBAMA WON'T BACK DOWN AFTER CHINESE THREAT, SENDS US WARSHIPS TO CONTESTED SILANDS IN "MATTER OF DAYS".

* SAME > [Free Thought Project] US TO SEND WARSHIPS TO SOUTH CHINA SEA IN AN APPARENT ATTEMPT TO KICK OFF [start] WORLD WAR III.

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > AMERICA'S FADING FOOTPRINT IN THE MIDDLE EAST: AS RUSSIA BOMBS + PLOTS [in Syria, Other?] THE US ROLE IS [OWG Globalist POTUS Obama = Intentionally] SHRINKING, + THE REGION'S MAJOR PLAYERS ARE LOOKING FOR NEW WAYS TO ADVANCE THEIR OWN INTERESTS.

Ditto EVERY EACH + ALL US REGIONAL ALLIES IN WEST-EAST-SOUTH-SE ASIA???

* JAPAN TIMES > AL-NUSRA LEADER [Abu Mohammad Al-Golani = YT Video Msg] VOWS TO LAUNCH ATTACKS ON ASSAD'S ALAWITE SECT TO AVENGE RUSSIAN BOMBING.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-10-12 23:15  

#12  Tis Tuesday ...

* TOPIX > [Instapundit = PJ Media] BRAVE SIR BARACK RAN AWAY:HAS THE WHITE HOUSE [POTUS Obama]GIVEN UP ON CONFRONTING RUSSIA?

Ditto as per agz CHINA in SCS-ECS, IRAN in Persian Gulf + ME???

FULL OF SUPER-PC/DENIABLE SOUND-N-FURY, BUT ULTIMATELY TO STILL DO NOTHING + ALLOW PUTIN, CHINA, + IRAN TO HAVE THEIR WAY???

* WORLD MILITARY FORUM > US PLANS TO PREVENT CHINA FROM HELPING RUSSIA TO FIGHT ISIL IN MIDDL EAST | WASHINGTON IS SAID TO BE PLANNING TO SEND [US Navy] WARSHIPS CLOSE TO THE DISPUTED SPRATLY ISLANDS IN SOUTH CHINA SEA, WHICH CHINA CALIMS AS ITS OWN, AS A MEANS TO PREVENTING OR STOPPING CHINA FROM ASSISTNING RUSSIA IN ITS CAMPAIGN AGZ THE ISLAMIC STTAE + OTHER TERRORIST GROUPS IN SYRIA, MARCO MAIER WRITES FOR "CONTRA MAGAZIN".

* THANH NIEN NEWS [Vietnam] SAUDIS WARN RUSSIA ITS ACTIONS IN SYRIA WILL HAVE "DANGEROUS CONSEQUENCES" [for Russia + Russian Interests] | SYRIA AIR STRIKES PUT RUSSIA AT RISK OF REVENGE ATTACKS.

KSA WARNING TO PUTIN = US/POTUS OMAMA'S WARNING TO PUTIN = RUSSIA IS GETTING ITSELF INVOLVED IN A BLODDY SECTARIAN WAR + ISLAMIST JIHADIS ALL AROUND THE WORLD MAY BECOME INSPIRED TO COME TO SYRIA + ME TO FIGHT RUSSIA.

versus

* TOPIX > [Australia] MALCOLM: OBAMA ASSERTS PUTIN IS WEAK AND NO CHALLENGE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-10-12 22:59  

#11  Obama knows he has lost on the world stage, but being the narcissist he is would never admit it. Let Putin do his thing in the middle east, the US isnt willing to do it under this administration , not to mention can't really afford it. Let someone else take the role an go back to isolationalism andet the shit take care of themselves. That goes with taking away all aid.
Posted by: chris   2015-10-12 21:30  

#10  I remember Napoleon's Strategic Re-positioning from Moscow...
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2015-10-12 18:56  

#9  Regarding options 1, 2, and 3 in the article it seems to me 3 is the least likely. The US tends to send multiple carriers when they expect action.

Obama has given up on the ground so why bother having carriers. The chance of an 'accident' only goes up if we're in the area with no intent to seriously fight. O doesn't want the American people crying for blood when he has no intent of putting American troops into the middle east again.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-10-12 18:18  

#8  NASA is supposed to be helping boost Muslim morale after all.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-10-12 18:16  

#7  Besoeker: given that the cruise missiles crashed, maybe NASA provided technical assistance as well as funding?
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2015-10-12 16:19  

#6  Strategi re-positioning for this president is placing the sand trap rake in front of the trap on #18.
Posted by: Airandee   2015-10-12 15:59  

#5  "Strategic re-positioning?" Part of the Nobama phrasal idiomatic expression such as "Leading from behind."
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-10-12 11:51  

#4  Years of NASA purchasing Russian RD-180 engines appears to have assisted the Russian missile development funding effort.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-10-12 06:18  

#3  >Three unnamed US military officials claimed on Thursday that some cruise missiles fired from Russian ships at targets in Syria landed in Iran.


Perhaps they were booster parts?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2015-10-12 06:09  

#2  Ah yes, the Movie "PEARL HARBOR" wid Ben Affleck, Etal. where 1941 Amerika was Young, Dumb, + Communist but just didn't know it until the US tricked Japan into attacking the US' own Naval Base at Pearl.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-10-12 01:30  

#1  "US Retreats as China invades Northern Luzon, advances in Pacific/WESTPAC" [Bombs Japan?] > OOOOOPPPSSSSIES, MY BAD.

As per LUCIANNE + Investors Business Daily [IBD.com], the Bammer says that RUSSIA = VLAD PUTIN is N-O-T "Leading" or being a "Good Leader" in Syria iff doing so MAKES RUSSIA'S ECONOMY WORSE + GETTING RUSSIAN TROOPS INVOLVED OR MIRED IN SYRIAN + MIDDLE EAST AFFAIRS VEE GWOT = FIGHT AGZ ISIS/ISIL.

True enuff, BUT OHHH-SOOOO-PCORRECT/DENIABLE AS THE BAMMER COULD SAY THE SAME THINGS TO PLACATE OR APPEASE MAINSTREAM/ORDINARY AMERIKA IFF A MAJOR US WAR BROKE OUT AGZ RISING CHINA ANDOR RISING IRAN IN EAST ASIA-WESTPAC + PERSIAN GULF, AS TO WHY THE US CAN'T DEFEND ITS ALLIES OR LIVE UP TO BINDING TREATY OBLIGATIONS WID SAME.

* TOPIX > [Washington Times} ISIS GROWS IN AFGHANISTAN, ENCROACHES ON KABUL AS US REMAINS A "PASSIVE OBSERVER".

* WORLD MILITARY FORUM > US MEDIAS: US CONFRONTATION WID CHINA MORE WORRISOME THREAT THAN RUSSIA'S INTERVENTION IN SYRIA.

TOLD YA [again again] - Sorry, but this time I'm going to have to demand ArrozCaldo wid my AM Donuts + Coffee.

* WASHINGTON POST > US NAVY TO CHINA: "WE WILL SEND OUR WARSHIPS ANYWHERE NEAR YOUR MAN-MADE ISLANDS [South China Sea] WHENEVER WE WANT".

Again, unfortunately for the USN's bravado, + US Regional Allies, its Anti-US US OWG Globalist POTUS Obama that will give the USN + USDOD any marching orders to go head-to-head = "butt horns" agz OWG Co-Superpowers China, Russia, + Iran, Etal.

OR, IN ALTERNATE, THE [Intentional = Deliberate]LACK OF MARCHING ORDERS AGZ SAME.

* WAFF > TURKEY IS NOW A THEATER [of Milpol/Geopol Confrontation] OF [between]THE WEST AND RUSSIA DISPUTE OVER SYRIA.

How many "Red Lines" can Amerika get for XMAS 2015 = New Year 2016 from the Bammer + Globalists???

* SPUTNIK > OBAMA'S TPP IS A GEO-STRATEGIC DEAL BETWEEN THE US + JAPAN TO CONTAIN CHINA.

* RELATED LUCIANNE >[IBD] OBAMA: TRUST ME - THE TPP AGREEMENT IS BETTER FOR THE US THAN PAST TRADE DEALS.

* Also from LUCIANNE, DRUDGEREPORT > LOUIS FARRAKHAN: AMERICA IS NOW UNDER THE DIVINE JUDGEMENT OF GOD, CALAMITIES ARE GOING TO GET STRONGER.

Iff what POTUS Obama says is true, then why did GOD + Madonna + Guam Taotamonas show the US in dark geopol retreat across East Asia-WESTPAC + World, + having to sink Guam + other strategic Pacific Isles vee Super-MilTech, etc. to deny their utility to China + Nuclear Islam, espec CHINA, "GUAM WILL CAPSIZE" = USN PEARL HARBOR BB USS "OKLAHOMA" WILL CAPSIZE AFTER THE JAPANESE - YOU KNOW, AMERICAN - ATTACK ON ITS OWN MILBASE [9-11 = NYC] BACK IN NOT-9-11 1941???

Ironically, PRO-"ANTI-WHITEY"-JIHAD-AGZ-AMERIKA LOUIS FARRKHAN may be more correct or realistic per Allan + DIvine Judgement, than the Bammer + No-Popular-Vote, Anti-Sovereign TPP.

* Lastly, TOPIX + LUCIANNE > THE NEXT GENERATION: ISIS PUSHES "BABY BOOM" TO SECURE CALIPHATE FUTURE.

Wehell, it is true that the future MUSLIM/ISLAMIC NUCLEAR NAPOLEON 2030-2050, from NOSTRADAMUS'
"Deepest part of the West", was a Baby himself once.

GOD = DEVIL'S ADVOCATE AL "LUCIFER/SATAN" PACINO
= "I DON'T DO THAT, KEVIN!", I.E. HE DOESN'T NEED TO TRICK PEOPLE TO GET THEM TO ENTRAP THEMSELVES OR TO DESTROY THEMSELVES.

EYES WIDE OPEN, NOT EYES WIDE SHUT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-10-12 01:25  

00:00