You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Feds Approve First New Nuclear Reactor In 20 Years
2015-10-24
[Daily Caller] U.S. regulators have given the go-ahead for the country's first nuclear reactor in 20 years to begin commercial operations after years of public fears over a major nuclear meltdown.

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is now officially permitted to begin commercial reactor operations of the new reactor in 2016. Construction on this reactor began 43 years ago, but work ended in 1985 (after more than $1 billion had already been spent) due to a construction scandal. The TVA revived the project in 2007, at a time when nuclear power seemed poised to make a comeback.

The new reactor will produce nearly 2,300 megawatts of electricity-- enough to power 1.3 million homes. Nuclear power accounted for 19 percent of all electricity generated in the United States in 2014.

The high costs of new nuclear construction, competition from cheaper natural-gas, and political difficulties from the Japanese Fukushima nuclear disaster have hampered the nuclear industry.

Two reactors, the Vermont Yankee reactor and Wisconsin's reactor, have been eliminated by competition from cheap natural gas. The San Onofre reactor in California was shut down due to safety concerns, as was the Crystal River reactor in Florida. The world's largest nuclear plant operator, Électricité de France, withdrew from a joint venture that would have created three new American nuclear plants-- after it had already invested billions of dollars.

Political opposition from Nevada Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid prevented the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site from opening, leaving nuclear plants without a good place to store spent fuel. Such opposition also created legal liabilities for the federal government that could exceed $50 billion.

Despite these problems, four new nuclear reactors are expected to enter service by the end of the decade. New nuclear reactor designs are much safer, and actually emit less radiation than coal plants. Recent breakthroughs in fusion could also potentially restart the atomic age, when nuclear progress was lauded as a pinnacle of human achievement.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  This is the second reactor at the site.
The people that built No 1 are not the ones that built No 2. The present Authority can't keep an Ash Pond in one place.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2015-10-24 12:24  

#7  Does anybody remember that when Sir/St Thomas More wrote Utopia the word literally meant "nowhere"
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2015-10-24 10:39  

#6  I live 30 miles downwind.

This is the second reactor at the site. Watts Bar 1 has been online nearly 20 years. 2300 MW is the two reactors total capacity.

BTW, WB-1 also produces tritium for US nuke weapons.
Posted by: Betty Hitler2611   2015-10-24 10:13  

#5  Also, when Fusion finally becomes possibe the Greens will fight it tooth and nail. Because it isn't "re-newable". It isn't "green". It isn't "Earth friendly". Oh, wait we can't say "Earth". It has to be "earth" because the capitalization of the first letter might be construed as "sexist", "racist", or poosibly religous. Better to tell everybody the reactor runs on pixie dust and harmonious thoughts
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2015-10-24 10:06  

#4  Hopefully, and I mean I really hope, by the time this is ready to come online one of the Fusion start-ups will have produced a working design that produces more energy than it takes to run. Even better would be the Proton/Boron11 reaction cycle that offers the direct conversion to electricity. And I think the start-ups are the best bet because I sure don't trust any of the government backed research such as ITER to work. With the possible exception of the Navy's such efforts. After all the Navy is interested in a useful end product. The DOEs fusion researchers are interested more in process, expermentation, discussions, meetings and their end product is of course the Holy Grail of acedamia "Publication". The DOEs efforts have been more about producing papers and phds than electricity. After all if we had cheap electricity our betters (the afore mentioned phds) might be offended that we might use that energy to run our A/G's or other such nonsense.
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2015-10-24 10:00  

#3  Now, the long unending court fights by the greenies.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-10-24 08:49  

#2  What could possibly go wrong ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-10-24 06:02  

#1  I hope they got it right. I live 30 miles downwind.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2015-10-24 05:47  

00:00