| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| Bill Clinton Privately Mocked Paula Jones as an Attention-Seeking 'Floozy' |
| 2016-01-07 |
| [FREEBEACON] Bill Clinton ...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of is... dismissed Paula Jones in the 1990s as a "floozy" and a "nobody" who was only suing him for sexual harassment in order to have her "moment in the sun," according to an audio diary recorded at the time by one of his closest confidantes. Clinton's friend and biographer, Taylor Branch, took notes on a late-night conversation he had with the president on Oct. 2, 1997, and immediately recorded them into an audio diary. The recordings were recently obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. According to Branch's diary, Clinton discussed the pending sexual harassment lawsuit brought against him by former Arkansas government employee Paula Jones, who claimed he unzipped his pants and asked her to perform a sex act on him in a Little Rock hotel room in 1991. "[Clinton] said they had now changed Paula Jones's hair style, made her look less like a floozy, and that she didn't seem to have any visible income but was always driving a new car," said Branch, a historian who drew from many of his diary entries to write his 2010 Clinton biography The Clinton Tapes. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #9 Copy, not source |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2016-01-07 17:54 |
| #8 Does anyone have a link on that Charles Krauthammer piece? |
| Posted by: Crusader 2016-01-07 10:33 |
| #7 Back the headline- it takes one to know one, Willie. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2016-01-07 07:51 |
| #6 Don't pretend to be an idiot, besoeker. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-01-07 04:17 |
| #5 'Crying or laughing' at the comments of a psychiatrist ? |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2016-01-07 03:58 |
| #4 Remember, most people are not well informed. We must somehow inform and educate them Should I cry, or should I roll on the floor laughing? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-01-07 02:42 |
| #3 Charles Krauthammer - ON THE CLINTON'S The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest, and we are financing it! Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history. This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and re-package it, to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works: 1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada. 2. Foreign oligarch's & governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did, contributing mega millions. I am sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send un-told millions to a Canadian charity). 3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations & makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation. 4. The Clinton Foundation, and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. 5. The Clinton Foundation, then "spends" some of this money, for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to un-told numbers of hangers on, & fund lavish travel, etc. Again virtually all tax free, which means you & I are subsidizing it. 6. The Clinton Foundation with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns. 7. Net result: foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free & untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes, as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, a Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests & then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and, guess who was Secretary of State, when the approval, was granted? As an aside, imagine how former, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors, for a guy promoting, a vitamin company. Not legal, but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk. Sarcasm aside, if you are still not persuaded, this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations & countries in need? This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk, she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest, and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Do not let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. We must somehow inform and educate them. Charles Krauthammer Warm Wishes and May God Bless America. p.s. God help America! |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2016-01-07 02:32 |
| #2 Welcome to the wonderful world of objective journalism SPOD. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-01-07 02:31 |
| #1 What is little mentioned is that the Washington Post interviewed Paula Jones in October before the first Clinton election and editors at the WaPo sat on the story until after Paula had her first press conference. The WaPo could have put an end to the Clinton campaign and deliberately quashed important information. |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2016-01-07 00:17 |