You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
--Tech & Moderator Notes
Civil discourse on the Burg
2016-01-10
To all readers,

Allow this post to serve as a gentle reminder of the bright lines we mods draw on comments:
  • Racist and racially provocative language on the Burg is banned. Regulars who engage in this will be redacted as a warning. Further offenses lead to banning. For visitors, banning is the first step.

    Many different people read the Burg. Some are in governance or the military. Some are outside the US. The Burg punches above its weight. We are read by people who matter. No one wants to read racist garbage. So don't do it.

  • Likewise, frank misogynist language and images are banned. We at the Burg enjoy our cheesecake images (beefcake for the women regulars also is fine), but there's a difference and any reasonable person knows what that limit is. Don't cross it.

  • Anti-religious bigotry gets you into trouble real quick. It's okay to be against Islamicists; those folks are thugs and a threat. It's okay to be against Christian Identity types who want most all of us dead or in chains. But don't confuse such groups with the larger groups of decent, civil people with religious belief -- or no religious belief. Our beef is with the terrorists and their sympathizers.

  • Threats against American citizens and law-abiding, civil Westerners are banned. Regulars who engage in this will be redacted as a warning. Further offenses lead to banning. For visitors, banning is the first step.

    Threats made against Americans, and civil Westerners in general, are one of the things that can get the Burg into trouble. That creates problems for Fred. Don't do it. This rule does not extend to jihadis, thugs and general miscreants around the world -- if you want to double-tap Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, I'll spot for you.

  • Abusive language towards others on the Burg will be redacted. Sometimes tempers flare, and we mods have an understanding and tolerance for the occasional dust-up. There are limits. The Lavender Mod will bring out the periwinkle clue bat when needed.
As always, we thank you for reading the Burg. It's our pleasure and privilege to make it available.
Posted by:Steve White

#19  May I thank Fred, the Mods and all their tolerance for managing my past, current and likely future abuses?
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-01-10 21:00  

#18  No, I don't beleave I've ever experienced the gentle ministrations of the periwinkle cluebat.

Nor do I want to. There are a number of people I've tagged as 'Do not piss off!'. Out of respect of course.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2016-01-10 20:55  

#17  I have Norwegian cousins on my father's side. Also Swedish cousins. They don't share their hammers, though, and y'all are delightful sillies.
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-01-10 19:56  

#16  Having Norwegian heritage, Thor was my favorite comic back in the day
Posted by: Frank G   2016-01-10 19:16  

#15  :-) I know
Posted by: Frank G   2016-01-10 19:14  

#14  Thor's hammer, Frank.
Posted by: Pappy   2016-01-10 18:39  

#13  wait, what?
Posted by: Frank G   2016-01-10 18:28  

#12  The periwinkle cluebat has a name. Something like Mjolnir. Or its brother.
Posted by: gorb   2016-01-10 15:29  

#11  Damn CF have you ever seen the Periwinkle Cluebat? It's like BanHammerRazor. Heck wit it, I will be behind the couch.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-01-10 12:18  

#10  And of course this is Fred's site - he owns it and he makes the rules. You want to make the rules - get your own damn site.

This is not a democracy - you don't get a 'vote'. Nor do you have the right 'not' to be offended - you will be offended. Be prepared to defend your postings - you might just learn something!

IMHO - the mods are usually forgiving and accommodating but don't tolerate repeated foolish or truly offensive (as opposed to PC-offensive) postings. And the regulars do love their chew-toys. :).
Posted by: CrazyFool   2016-01-10 11:41  

#9  Easy.
Mine, like me.
Others.
Posted by: Elmegum Thrash9840   2016-01-10 10:50  

#8  Pls, oh pls, don't bring out the Periwinkle Cluebat, anything but that.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-01-10 09:18  

#7  "May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't."
Posted by: Unelet Protector of the Sith2424   2016-01-10 09:12  

#6  So what about the comments I've seen recently where regular posters call for mass murder? Darth Vader, looking at you.
Posted by: Elmavish Panda1401   2016-01-10 08:09  

#5  
Posted by: Lampedusa Creretch3679   2016-01-10 08:06  

#4  Can I also suggest requiring a warning on posts that bear Hillary's pictures?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-01-10 05:25  

#3  Welp
Posted by: newc   2016-01-10 02:52  

#2  Do we still have the exception for Jane Fonda?
Posted by: gorb   2016-01-10 02:24  

#1  As always, I reserve the right to punch you in the nose for your nonsense. Here are the appropriate rules for tolerance.

Analogous to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, is a hierarchy of tolerance, which in these troubled times we need.

And they go like this:

First, self-defense: Any argument that advocates for physically injuring or killing me/you or my/your family or friends must be opposed. It is not important who advocates it or under what justification. Any such argument must be met with the fullness of resistance without regard to the consequences. No tolerance, and no quarter.

Second, hate: Any argument that separates one class of people from another class, and advocates harm to the other, should be shunned and shamed. No tolerance, but quarter to those who agree to stop.

Third, division: Any argument that separates one class of people from another class, should be tolerated, while the validity of its arguments are vigorously examined.

Fourth, disagreement: An argument which is not persuasive to you, should be tolerated, and opposed by better facts.

Fifth, incoherence: Any argument that is not logically understandable, should tolerated, but ridiculed.

Sixth, agreement: Any argument with which you agree should be tolerated, but examined deeply for it is easy to fool yourself with your own thoughts.
Posted by: rammer   2016-01-10 01:43  

00:00