You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
China staking $5.2B methanol venture in Washington state
2016-01-22
Posted by:Seeking a cure for ignorance

#9  There are small fuel cells that use highly purified methanol as the hydrogen part of the fuel. Not cheap but handy in special situations. EFOY FUEL CELLS
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2016-01-22 20:19  

#8  What lord garth said. The markup on petrochemical products has to be seen to be believed!

For for both Oil and natural gas, profit wise energy production is a loss leader to the petro chemical industry. For fun, look up the cost of a barrel of methanol and contrast with the price of 50 gallons of gas at your local gas station.
Posted by: Nguard   2016-01-22 14:27  

#7  essentially, they are building a methanol plant in the US that will produce methanol at about $70/barrel and cost, say $10/barrel to ship to China instead of building more plants in China that produce methanol at, say $130/barrel

makes sense if the cost of natural gas in the US stays low and the cost of natural gas and coal in China stays high but not otherwise - if China had US technology, their natural gas production would soar




Posted by: lord garth   2016-01-22 13:26  

#6  If it's Washington State, the electricity's made from falling water.

In a way, the whole "Carbon tax" thing is a Bill of Attainder on people who don't have Grand Coulee Dam in their backyard. The rich bastards need to be taxed to make up the hole they've voted in our pockets.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2016-01-22 11:35  

#5  Zhang forecasts that the use of electricity (instead of nat gas to run the plant) can reduce carbon emissions from the plant by about 75 percent.

Genius! Wait, tell me again what electricity is made from?
Posted by: SteveS   2016-01-22 10:53  

#4  Chi-comms are not stupid at all
Nutritionally deprived of protein and socially isolated? Stunted perhaps, not stupid.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-01-22 10:15  

#3  ...well, I doubt the unions own and operate their party.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-01-22 08:00  

#2  Chi-comms are not stupid at all.

Or, at least, they make sure that their leaders are not stupidest of all.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-01-22 03:04  

#1  Interesting. Value-adding the daylights out of natural gas. No, the Chi-comms are not stupid at all.
Posted by: Nguard   2016-01-22 00:41  

00:00