| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| Time Magazine: Clinton's Email Troubles Come With Bad Political Timing |
| 2016-02-01 |
| Little here we didn't already know, but interesting article for Time Magazine. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #14 BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Put Spies’ Lives at Risk |
| Posted by: Blossom Unains5562 2016-02-01 21:58 |
| #13 18 - I'm getting my teeth cleaned next week... |
| Posted by: Raj 2016-02-01 20:23 |
| #12 +++, Sven. :-D |
| Posted by: Barbara 2016-02-01 19:32 |
| #11 There has got to be at least 17 people waiting in a doctor's office somewhere. |
| Posted by: Sven the pelter 2016-02-01 19:29 |
| #10 "17 people who still read Time" You're very optimistic, NMBS. |
| Posted by: Barbara 2016-02-01 19:26 |
| #9 This must have been a real shock to the 17 people who still read Time! |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2016-02-01 18:22 |
| #8 What timing in politix is not "bad?" |
| Posted by: Fred 2016-02-01 16:27 |
| #7 Covering up for their candidate, with an attempt to be 'fair and balanced' - "No one has suggested that Clinton or any of her aides or employees at the State Department intended to harm the interests of the United States in their handling of the classified material." |
| Posted by: Bobby 2016-02-01 13:09 |
| #6 So there is good political timing to deliver the gate keys to Hannibal? |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2016-02-01 12:39 |
| #5 You say bad political timing, I say felony jail time. Tuh-may-to, ta-mah-to. Any thoughts on this from Gen. Petraeus? |
| Posted by: SteveS 2016-02-01 12:37 |
| #4 She's been lying and obstructing the investigation for months. Any 'bad political timing' is entirely her fault. But that won't stop the media from claiming it's all political and we should 'move on'... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2016-02-01 08:17 |
| #3 Imagine the story if it was Sen. Ted Cruz that had violated the espionage act instead of the Hilldabeast. |
| Posted by: Sven the pelter 2016-02-01 06:53 |
| #2 The laws also empower the FBI and prosecutors to seek punishment for gross negligence in the handling of secrets generated by spy agencies like the NSA. Proving that in a court, however, requires evidence that Clinton had a “guilty state of mind,” according to George W. Bush’s last Attorney General, Michael Mukasey.... Yes, but the law assumes that the target of an investigation has at least some vestige of a "moral compass" that would enable that person to feel the emotion of guilt, or remorse. The Hildebeast lacks any capacity to feel remorse or guilt - her malignant hubris is so extreme that she feels that she is above national security laws, criminal laws - and any other kind of law. The thought of this wretched excuse for human being becoming POTUS just chills me to the bone. It would be as if the Wicked Witch of The West and her evil flying monkeys had become the real rulers of the Land Of Oz. Quick, someone drop a house on Hillary........ |
| Posted by: Lone Ranger 2016-02-01 04:48 |
| #1 The good news for Clinton is that the bar for any legal damage from that investigation is high. Yes, the bar is much, much lower with imprisonment and hefty fines assured for the little people. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2016-02-01 04:27 |