You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The Clinton Curse returns
2016-02-06
[Wash Times] In the many decades I have had the pleasure of covering the Clintons I have developed several themes about them that have over the years been validated by fact. One theme is that there is a Clinton Curse.

It afflicts many who come into contact with the fabulous couple. In the early days, the Curse brought down the McDougals, Webb Hubbell, Vince Foster and former Gov. Jim Guy Tucker, all of them by now figures known only to history. More recently it was Jeffrey Epstein, the child molester and Bill's pal and fellow epicurean. Now quite possibly, Josh Earnest, press secretary to President Obama, will be added to the list along with Hillary's aides, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Bryan Pagliano and Jake Sullivan. Possibly even David Brock will suffer the Clinton Curse. The Clintons are a couple to be avoided. Even the Democratic Party might not be spared come Election Day 2016.

Of course, the Clintons often turn to their favor circumstances that might spell doom to others. Consider the present imbroglio involving Hillary, her mysterious personal server, the FBI, and the aforementioned Clintonistas: Ms. Abedin, Ms. Mills, Mr. Pagliano and Mr. Sullivan. Many people whom I talk to tell me the FBI's interest in that personal server is ominous for Hillary, a matter I wrote about in this column three weeks ago. Yet this imbroglio when viewed from the Clintons' perspective might actually be helping them in their quest for the presidency.

The FBI's investigation is finding so much additional evidence of wrongdoing by the Clintons and their Clintonistas that the copious evidence is actually impeding the bureau from recommending indictments. No sooner does the bureau think it has wrapped up one set of indictments than it trips across another category of malfeasance. For instance, it seems that the FBI has now found the Clintons to have co-mingled their foundation's interests with Hillary's State Department work, and then there is her campaign fundraising, Bill's exorbitant lecture fees, and -- who knows -- the needs of the Clinton Library. If Hillary and Bill are lucky, the FBI investigations will be mired in new evidence for months to come.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  ...reads like something from the 'Omen'.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-02-06 17:38  

#8  Just read the Clinton Friends list, holy magillicuddy, that is amazing!
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2016-02-06 14:46  

#7  
Clinton "Friends" Who Knew Too Much
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2016-02-06 14:05  

#6  Gotta wait until the 13-second mark:

Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2016-02-06 13:58  

#5  The Clintons have been paid an estimated $153M in speaking fees since the end of Bill’s second term, at an average of over $200,000 per speech.
Posted by: Iblis   2016-02-06 12:42  

#4  As the article points out, the mud is so deep and toxic that any attempt to actually get an indictment will get stuck forever. "Don't throw me in that briar patch" could be the Clinton's motto.

The infinite volume of mud is much better than a stonewall for stopping the incoming rounds.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-02-06 11:25  

#3  So far, I doubt the existence of "Clinton Curse." Let me know when there are indictments and I might change my mind; otherwise it lawlessness and getting away with it as usual.
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-02-06 10:39  

#2  It's not so much a curse as a strategy.
The Clintons don't have friends and associates as such, rather, they surround themselves with "bullet sponges", in the hopes that if somebody takes a shot at one of them, you'll soak it up for them.
Posted by: ed in texas   2016-02-06 10:19  

#1  It's not baggage if you call it experience.
~ Paul Combs illustrations
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-02-06 10:19  

00:00