You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Chief Justice Roberts votes with the regime... again.
2016-03-04
[The Hill] Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rejected a plea Thursday to block a contentious air pollution rule for power plants in a big victory for the Obama administration.

Roberts’s order came despite his court’s 5-4 decision last year ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulation, known as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, is illegal.

Michigan led a group of 20 states last month -- empowered by the Supreme Court’s recent unprecedented decision to halt the EPA’s carbon dioxide rule for power plants -- in asking the court to live up to its ruling last year and block the regulation’s enforcement.

"Unless this court stays or enjoins further operation of the Mercury and Air Toxics rule, this court’s recent decision in Michigan v. EPA will be thwarted," the states wrote in a Feb. 23 filing with the court.

"A stay or injunction is appropriate because this court has already held that the finding on which the rule rests in unlawful and beyond EPA’s statutory authority."

The EPA responded that no judicial stay is necessary since it’s working to fix the problem the court identified by next month, and the states would not suffer irreparable harm in that time.

"The requested stay would harm the public interest by undermining reliance interests and the public health and environmental benefits associated with the rule," the government said. "The application lacks merit and should be denied."

Roberts acted swiftly, waiting less than a day after the EPA’s response brief to side with the Obama administration. He acted unilaterally, electing to reject the request himself rather than take it to the full court, which may have led to a 4-4 split following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death.

The mercury pollution standards, made final in 2012, are a separate regulation from the more controversial and costly carbon dioxide limits for power plants that are also being litigated in court.

The Supreme Court put an unprecedented halt to the carbon rule, known as the Clean Power Plan, last month by a 5-4 vote, when Roberts chose to let the full court vote on the matter. Thursday’s action by Roberts is completely separate from that case.

EPA spokeswoman Melissa Harrison said on Thursday the agency is "very pleased" with Roberts’s order.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  Temporary 'victory' until the current study is completed in April. The 'victory' for the EPA in means 45 days won't matter one way or the other - we ought to let the process play out.

link

The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request Thursday to block the EPA’s mercury-emissions rule while legal challenges proceed, handing a temporary victory to the the Obama administration and environmental groups.

Roberts’ refusal to grant a stay will allow the Obama administration to rein in toxic emissions while the EPA tabulates the rule’s cost. The agency’s review is expected to be finished in April.
Posted by: Bobby   2016-03-04 13:22  

#6  The mercury pollution standards

Mercury is a threat to health. That is why the govt mandates it's use in household light bulbs.
Posted by: SteveS   2016-03-04 10:22  

#5  As I said before, we really need to change the way the SC is done.

Each state appoints a judge for a one year term. Vice President is the winning vote in a tie.

Keeps presidents from stacking the court and idiots like Roberts in for life.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-03-04 09:28  

#4  Yep, we need a real* Republican in the White House to make sure that SCOTUS remains faithful the text of the (now ignored) Constitution by his appointments.

*real as defined by the GOPe. While GWB was a nice guy, he was a 'classical' liberal who would have just as easily fitted in with the 1950s or early 60s Donks.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-03-04 08:30  

#3  Does Roberts "ever" vote with the people? SCOTUS justices basically have positions for life unless they get impeached. The only justice who ever got impeached was Samuel Chase but he was acquitted by the Senate.
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-03-04 08:21  

#2  Anybody now why Roberts ruled? Any statements released, opinions written? What does he say to defend or explain his actions? For the record, you know?
Posted by: Bobby   2016-03-04 07:51  

#1  Unilateral Chief Justice, please meet unilateral POTUS. Oh, you two already know one another? Well then, let's get unilaterally busy shall we ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-03-04 07:38  

00:00