| Submit your comments on this article |
| Africa North |
| Obama's Libya Sh*t Show |
| 2016-03-15 |
 [Spectator] The reason for the military action, Obama then claimed, was the danger of a humanitarian catastrophe caused by Qaddafi's forces attacking civilians. The real reason was that France's access to Libyan sweet crude was blocked by Qaddafi. Neither France nor England had the ability to undertake the airstrikes necessary to overthrow Qaddafi's government, so U.S. forces were necessary despite the fact that no U.S. national security interest was at stake. |
| Posted by:Blossom Unains5562 |
| #4 It would be funny iff it wasn't also realistic. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2016-03-15 22:38 |
| #3 "Neither France nor England had the ability ... ... US forces [involvement] were necessary" > sO iff the US gives up 1/2 of the Pacific + 1/2 of the Atlantic in the name of righteous US-led Anti-US OWG-NWO + North American Union [OWG NAU + Similar], where the Pert, MSM-Net-verified "weak/declining" US unilaterally or "asymmetrically' confines itself to CONUS-NORAM-N-ONLY-CONUS-NORAM AS THE OWG GLOBIES DESIRE, HOW WILL THE UK + FRANCE, ETAL. EUROS + RUSSIA MEET FUTURE THREATS IFF US MILITARY POWER IS N-O-T FORTHCOMING, OR IN ALTERNATE NOT AS POTENT ANDOR LARGE AS HOPED??? FEAR NOTTETH, EU + AU + RUSSIA, ETAL. - THE CANARY ISLANDS MILITARY CONTINGENT IS COMING TO SAVE THE DAY! |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2016-03-15 22:37 |
| #2 But that would mean that Hildabeest was selling US policy for donations to the Clinton Global Initiative! Shocking to suggest that given her decades of selfless service to the nation. Oh wait, who am I kidding, that sounds exactly right .... |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2016-03-15 13:36 |
| #1 One would suspect that, given the then-SecState, there were financial inducements involved as well. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2016-03-15 12:53 |