Submit your comments on this article |
-Land of the Free |
SCOTUS Unanimously Backs Second Amendment |
2016-03-23 |
[PatriotPost] As Justice Samuel Alito wrote in an opinion accompanying the per curiam decision, 'Electronic stun guns are no more exempt from the Second Amendment's protections, simply because they were unknown to the First Congress, than electronic communications are exempt from the First Amendment, or electronic imaging devices are exempt from the Fourth Amendment.' |
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562 |
#3 Just how out of touch with reality does one have to be to get stomped by Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Breyer and Kagan -- on the Second Amendment! |
Posted by: Iblis 2016-03-23 19:00 |
#2 That's right, P2K. If Mohammed didn't know about it then it's unIslamic. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-03-23 12:52 |
#1 'Electronic stun guns are no more exempt from the Second Amendment's protections, simply because they were unknown to the First Congress, than electronic communications are exempt from the First Amendment, or electronic imaging devices are exempt from the Fourth Amendment.' Dear media, note well. If you think the standard side arm of the standing army is not to be owned by eligible members of the militia because such an 'assault' weapon didn't exist in 1792 (see Militia Act thereof) then by extension the only 'Press' protected by the First is that produced literally by a paper press of 1792. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-03-23 09:38 |