You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
Hildebeest: 'The Unborn Person Has no Human Rights.'
2016-04-04
[Wash Times] Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton ran afoul of both the pro-life and pro-choice sides of the abortion debate Sunday when she said constitutional rights do not apply to an "unborn person" or "child."

"The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," Mrs. Clinton said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "Now that doesn't mean that we don't do everything we possibly can in the vast majority of instances to, you know, help a mother who is carrying a child and wants to make sure that child will be healthy, to have appropriate medical support."

Mrs. Clinton also said "there is room for reasonable kinds of restrictions" on abortion during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  The way to answer this is to say "Right, cause it's your property." When they agree, point out that slaves are property too and as the party of slavery, the moral alignment is the same. Slaves and property are theirs to destroy.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2016-04-04 20:51  

#7  And you can say whatever you want about Bernie Sander but he's keeping pressure on the Beest which, it would seem, is beginning to make her very uncomfortable.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-04-04 11:39  

#6  You can use whatever PC terminology you want but we're still talking about human life.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-04-04 11:38  

#5  So says the ambling couch monster:



Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   2016-04-04 09:39  

#4  280th trimester?
Posted by: Glenmore   2016-04-04 09:28  

#3  Pools show Hillary loosing the "female vote" to Sanders?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-04-04 04:01  

#2  What about the 4th trimester?
Posted by: Unusomp Bucket3292   2016-04-04 03:57  

#1  A human? A person? No, no, nothing like that. We're nearly certain it's a chicken.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-04-04 02:27  

00:00