You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Economy may not have grown at all in first quarter
2016-04-06
It may turn out the economy did not grow at all in the first quarter. Trade data released Tuesday show the U.S. deficit widened more than expected to $47.1 billion in February and was a bigger drag on growth than expected. It's the latest economic metric that chiseled away at the tracking model for first quarter growth.

The median of economists who participate in the CNBC/Moody's Analtyics rapid update is now 0.5 percent for tracking GDP growth, down from 0.9 percent last week. Their average forecast for growth is 1.1 percent.

Given the average, and substantial, revisions to government GDP data, that 0.5 percent could easily turn into a negative number, or a much higher number. That is based on a CNBC study that examined every report going back to 1990 and found an average error rate of 1.3 percentage points in either direction.

The widely followed Atalanta Fed's GDPNow model sees the economy expanding by just 0.4 percent, down from 0.6 percent. Tracking forecasts are based on the data that has been reported.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  "It's just resting."
Posted by: charger   2016-04-06 17:37  

#8  Either the Army or talking head news consultants.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-04-06 14:45  

#7  oops. wrong thread
Posted by: newc   2016-04-06 13:06  

#6  Does the Army need 14 active four star Generals?
Posted by: newc   2016-04-06 13:05  

#5  No growth has actually happened since 2009.
1% 2% does not cover growth of even the population. They lie about these numbers too.
The books are cooked.

You need 2 or more consecutive quarters of 5.5% growth to pull out of a recession. This has not happened yet. In fact, it's time for another recession about right now.
Posted by: newc   2016-04-06 13:01  

#4  What was the number of Americans employed in 2008 and (at similar pay/job levels) today?

I don't think we can compare that given the enormous "unforeseeable" shift to part-time McJobs.
Posted by: gorb   2016-04-06 11:12  

#3  Outside the inflation created by the Fed-Treasury printing (or button pushing) of money, has there really been any growth beyond statistical variance (5%) since 2008? What was the number of Americans employed in 2008 and (at similar pay/job levels) today?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-04-06 10:49  

#2  Those still employed are buying imports.
Those not are planting potatoes.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-04-06 09:41  

#1  Given my "trust" in gov't statistics, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that growth for Q1 was actually negative.

Afterall we are seeing the initial stages of socialism.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-04-06 08:15  

00:00