You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
California Labor Union That Fought for $15 Minimum Wage Now Wants an Exemption
2016-04-10
[DAILYSIGNAL] The labor union that led the charge for a $15 minimum wage hike in cities across Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, is now moving to secure an exemption for employers under union contracts.

The Los Angeles County Federation of Labor buried the exemption on the eighth page of its 12-page proposal for the Santa Monica City Council to review Tuesday while deciding whether to follow Los Angeles and increase the minimum wage.

The loophole would allow employers with collective bargaining agreements to sidestep the wage hike and pay their union members below the proposed $15-per-hour minimum wage.

James Sherk, a research fellow in labor economics at The Heritage Foundation, said the exemption is a union attempt to encourage businesses to unionize by making themselves the only low-wage option as union membership continues to drop off.

"This proposal would force any worker in Santa Monica whose labor is worth less than $15 an hour to purchase union representation in order to hold a job," Sherk said. "Unions should not be able to selectively exempt themselves from the harmful consequences of the minimum wage hikes they lobby for."

The move in Santa Monica is not the federation of labor’s first attempt to compound a collective bargaining exemption into a minimum wage increase.

The federation received an outpouring of criticism when it attempted to push the same carve-out for unionized employers after Los Angeles decided to increase its minimum wage from $9 to $15.

"This is hypocrisy at its worst," the Los Angeles Times wrote in a blistering editorial. "It plays into the cynical view that the federation is more interested in unionizing companies and boosting its rolls of dues-paying members than in helping poor workers."
Posted by:Fred

#4  May be an outdated article but nonetheless illustrates the union bosses' cynicism.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2016-04-10 16:02  

#3  Is there some kind of "fee" for the waiver?
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2016-04-10 11:32  

#2  Sept. 30, 2015. Good catch, lord garth -- thank you.
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-04-10 10:36  

#1  this article is from 6 months ago and has, to some extent, been overtaken by events as there is now a statewide multiyear move to $15/hr
Posted by: lord garth   2016-04-10 00:33  

00:00