| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Land of the Free |
| Scientists: Michelle Obama’s Nutrition Facts Label Not Based on Science |
| 2016-05-21 |
| [FREEBEACON] A controversial regulation to update the nutrition facts label that is part of the first lady’s Let’s Move push was finalized by the Food and Drug Administration on Friday, and scientists are warning the new label is not based on sound science. The changes to the nutrition facts label, which first lady Michelle Obama will announce Friday when she speaks at the Let’s Move-aligned Partnership for a Healthier America, requires food manufacturers to list added sugars, which scientists say lacks "scientific rigor." The label will also cost companies at least $640 million to update, and a net social cost of $1.4 billion. "I am thrilled that the FDA has finalized a new and improved Nutrition Facts label that will be on food products nationwide," Mrs. Obama said in a statement. "This is going to make a real difference in providing families across the country the information they need to make healthy choices." In her remarks, Mrs. Obama called the added sugar change to the label the "most important of all." The regulation requires calorie amounts to be larger, and companies will have two years to begin including "added sugars" in order to "help consumers know how much sugar is added to the product during the processing of foods," the White House said. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #3 Lysenkoism and socialism are synonymous |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-05-21 08:12 |
| #2 Moose didn't get that Hugh Jass by reading nutrition labels. |
| Posted by: Eohippus Snore8229 2016-05-21 07:11 |
| #1 Another big, "SO WHAT!" Those consumers that can read, can't read the tiny numbers anyway. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2016-05-21 01:27 |