You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
House Democrats ask to review Benghazi report before it is released
2016-06-01
[The Hill] House Democrats are asking for a chance to review the GOP's report on the Benghazi terrorist attacks before it is released to the public.

The five Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi sent a letter to Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) proposing a "joint report" on Benghazi that starts with findings shared by lawmakers in both parties "followed by areas on which reasonable people may disagree."

Failing that, Democrats said they should be able to review a draft copy of the Republican-led committee's work, in order to add "corrections, additional context or other input before you release it publicly." In exchange, Democrats said they would let Republicans review their own opposing report for the same purpose.

"In our view, the worst approach would be for you to publicly release a partisan report drafted only by Republicans that has never been reviewed by nearly half of the select committee members," ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and the committee's four other Democrats wrote.

"Such a report would not have the benefit of robust vetting by all select committee members and, as a result, very likely would include critical errors and other deficiencies."
Posted by:Besoeker

#12  The proper response is: We have to release the report to know what is in it.
Posted by: Mortimer Braille, Esq.   2016-06-01 19:40  

#11  Tell them to go fuck themselves. Cite the Tydings Committee Report.
Posted by: Iblis   2016-06-01 16:35  

#10  At this point any mutterings about "It should be bi-partisan" is just trolling by the 5 democrats on the House Select Committee.
Posted by: Charles   2016-06-01 16:08  

#9  Do you mean this Elijah Cummings?
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   2016-06-01 13:21  

#8  Heh, heh. Elections have consequences.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-06-01 12:16  

#7  I don't know why the Donks even bother. Any spinning and obfuscating that needs to take place to protect Shedevil will be performed by the fawning media.
Posted by: Crusader   2016-06-01 12:12  

#6  So they can prepare the spin and get in front of the press cycle. Screw them. They have fought and complained the whole way. Let them put their misgivings in their rebuttal report. Then file charge of obstruction against them.

Yet again, another example of just how broken our congress is. An ambassador is brutally murdered and the investigation is a partisan event. All of them in congress needs to bow before our Statue of Liberty and beg forgiveness.
Posted by: 49 pan   2016-06-01 11:45  

#5  Seems like they know Queen McCacklepants will not look good from this report and they want to soften the blow so the media has a better spin.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-06-01 11:44  

#4  "Such a report would not have the benefit of robust vetting by all select committee members and, as a result, very likely would include critical errors and other deficiencies."

Paving the way to an excuse.
Posted by: gorb   2016-06-01 11:36  

#3  According to Hillary and her minions there is nothing to see here so why the concern by the House Donks about anyone seeing the Benghazi report?
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-06-01 11:05  

#2  I thought Elijah Cummings was involved somewhere in this story--one of the biggest obstructionists in the Donk Party.
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-06-01 11:03  

#1  They refused to be a constructive part of the process, now they want to change the outcomes. Bugger OFF !
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-06-01 09:24  

00:00