You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Trump’s Appeal to Radical Middle Is a Wake-Up Call to Conservatives
2016-06-19
[NationalReview] Donald Trump clinched the GOP nomination by exploiting vulnerabilities few were aware existed. When the 2016 race began, almost no one seemed to have understood that a plurality of the Republican party had a fundamentally different set of policy preferences from those of doctrinaire conservatism. Trump saw this opening and took full advantage.

Trump’s positions follow the contours not of movement conservatism but of American folk nationalism, often known as Jacksonianism. As Walter Russell Mead, my boss over at The American Interest, has noted, Jacksonians characteristically emphasize anti-elitism and egalitarianism while drawing a sharp distinction between members of the folk group and those outside it.

In domestic policy, this translates to tough-on-crime stances and stubborn adherence to traditional views on social issues (and, historically, opposition to civil rights), and to advocacy of government assistance for “deserving” members of the folk group. Looking abroad, they are uninterested in Wilsonian nation-building projects or promoting global order, but if they feel the nation is threatened, they are willing to fight back by whatever means are necessary. Sound familiar yet?
Posted by:Pappy

#16  NR show their true RINO face, dont they?

Posted by: Jack Phamp4944   2016-06-19 23:56  

#15  IMO that voters vote for the candidate they think will harm them the least. At the Congressional level, the voters often vote such that they elect a Congress that prevents a POTUS from implementing a personal agenda that is too extreme and harms them. Sometimes they will turn over a Congress dominated by one party so that they achieve gridlock.
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-06-19 22:37  

#14  The so called alt right is just sticking their lies on top of Ryan's and McConnell's.

Only without the Hugo Boss uniforms.
Posted by: Pappy   2016-06-19 22:36  

#13  Conservatism was defeated by Ryan and Boehner long before Trump.did. They did it by saying they were conservative and then giving Obama whatever he wanted. The so called alt right is just sticking their lies on top of Ryan's and McConnell's.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2016-06-19 20:26  

#12  Is our troll back?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-06-19 20:03  

#11  If I held my nose and voted for Bush, McCain and Romney they can damn well hold their noses and vote for Trump. Or maybe they'll show their true colors and vote for Hillary.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2016-06-19 16:47  

#10  Just another RINO with a mouth.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-06-19 11:46  

#9  This shit pisses me off. So its a damn hate crime to call islam radical, it does nothing according to our president, so where the hell is he on this one???
Posted by: 49 Pan   2016-06-19 10:58  

#8  Radical middle? Really? So the majority of the middle class is radical?? Bullshit, another one of Sauls tricks of isolation..
Posted by: 49 Pan   2016-06-19 10:56  

#7  There are enough Jacksonians to win a split GOP primary. There are not enough of them to win a majority in nearly all the opposed primaries, much less a general election. Pluralities must build alliances, not wedge people away.

Trump and his supporters need to mend fences fast, or he is going down in the biggest flames since McGovern. This will be even worse if the Democrats are forced to replace the felon they have now with just about anyone else.

The Donald needs to learn how to shut up and play nice. Thats all that he needs to do to beat Hillary. He seems incapable of that.
Posted by: Fat Bob Slearong3746   2016-06-19 10:42  

#6   At least McCain and Romney made an effort a headfake toward them.
Posted by: Frank G   2016-06-19 10:10  

#5  You misspelled Mainstream.
Posted by: P2Kontheroad   2016-06-19 07:19  

#4  historically, opposition to civil rights

IMO, given how "civil rights" work today, that was really prescient of them.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-06-19 04:56  

#3  "historically, opposition to civil rights"

Firearm freedom (one of the characteristic concerns of Jacksonians) isn't a civil rights issue?
Posted by: no mo uro   2016-06-19 04:47  

#2  The idea that America has never had a sense of national folk identity is just plain false — and making political and policy judgments on that assumption was madness.

Hear, hear.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-06-19 04:41  

#1  few were aware would admit existed
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-06-19 04:35  

00:00