You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Trump’s Speech About Hillary Was Terrifyingly Effective
2016-06-23
[SLATE] Donald Trump’s Wednesday morning speech about Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as The Heroine of Tuzla and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Edward Stettinius, Jr. ...
’s record is probably the most unnervingly effective one he has ever given. In a momentary display of discipline, he read from a teleprompter with virtually no ad-libbing, avoiding digs at Bill Clinton
...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of is...
’s infidelity or conspiracy theories about Vince Foster’s suicide. Standing in a low-ceilinged conference room bedecked with square chandeliers in the Trump SoHo, a lawsuit-plagued hotel and condo development, Trump spoke for 40 minutes without saying anything overtly sexist. Instead, he aimed straight at Clinton’s most-serious weaknesses, describing her as a venal tool of the establishment. "Hillary Clinton gave China millions of our best jobs and effectively let China completely rebuild itself," he said. "In return, Hillary Clinton got rich!" He added, "She gets rich making you poor," and called her possibly "the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency."

The point is not that this is true; as political analyst David Gergen said on CNN, the speech was slanderous. But the lies in the speech, many taken from Peter Schweizer’s book Clinton Cash, were not obviously self-refuting. At one point, Trump said, citing Schweizer, "Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation." This has been debunked many times over, including by FactCheck.org.

To explain why it’s not true, though, you have to go into details about Clinton’s role on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which approved the sale of a Canadian-based energy company with American mining stakes to Russia’s nuclear energy agency. It’s a very different sort of lie than the one Trump told at a meeting of evangelicals on Tuesday when he said there’s "nothing out there" about Hillary Clinton’s religion--in fact, her Methodism is extremely well-known even to her political enemies.

Posted by:Fred

#9  There's a lesson here: don't be afraid to tell the truth about the progressives, because they aren't afraid to lie about you.
Posted by: Steve White   2016-06-23 15:29  

#8  I missed who was terrified. Hidabeest? then there was some truth in it. The media? They'll just have to work the out-of-context a little harder, no big deal.

If the GOPe was terrified, that's good, right?
Posted by: Bobby   2016-06-23 14:01  

#7  Furthermore, if Clinton Cash is libelous, when can we expect the Clintons to sue?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-06-23 12:05  

#6  I can think of two outright lies told by the mainstream media right off the top of my head.

First, when ABC and others made such a big deal about Trump's response to a hypothetical question about abortion with Chris Matthews. Matthews asked, if abortion is banned should a women be punished for getting an abortion? Well, duh, if it's banned and there is no punishment what is the point of a ban? So Trump said "Yes". ABC jumped on it claiming simply that Trump wants women to be punished for getting abortions. They showed about two seconds worth of him saying yes without any context whatsoever and completely ignoring the fact that Trump will not ban abortions.

Then last night when CBS aired a story about Brexit they showed Nigel Farage in front of a bus with a picture from when all those young men from Syria and elsewhere were walking into Europe toward Germany. The reporter said the ad showed an "imaginary horde". Dude, that horde was real. I remember watching the video, not on CBS of course. CBS lied. Big time.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-06-23 12:02  

#5  not true? slanderous?

Bullshit

and Factcheck.org is a partisan op
Posted by: Frank G   2016-06-23 11:00  

#4  More please, and faster. Please integrate 'white boards' held by Linda Tripp, Juanita Broaddrick, and Paul Jones, as well as web links.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-06-23 09:43  

#3  Terrifyingly effective = Truth hit home?
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-06-23 09:19  

#2  It’s a very different sort of lie

You know, the sort that isn't any kind of falsehood at all. Or, in the vernacular, "a fact". Damnable things, facts.

as political analyst David Gergen said on CNN, the speech was slanderous.

You know, "slander", defined in Washington circles as "something that makes me look bad and reveals my actual behavior and interests in a light unflattering, and to my allies' discomfort".
Posted by: Charles M. Hagmaier   2016-06-23 08:43  

#1  The point is not that this is true

Since when has the truth been of any use for the Left and its media minions? For the Progressives, power is the only truth. OMG, he's using their own play book.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-06-23 07:44  

00:00