You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Meet the US's answer to China's 'carrier killer' missile
2016-07-22
[BusinessInsider] The US Navy just named the first carrier-based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) the MQ-25A Stingray.

The Navy has been pursuing a carrier-based drone since 2006 -- first as a long-range stealthy bomber, then as a surveillance and strike craft, and finally as a flying tanker. Though air-to-air refueling is hardly a breakthrough, having a carrier-based tanker provides the Navy with a possible solution to one of their most pressing problems -- anti-access area denial (A2AD).

Both China and Russia have developed ranged platforms capable of locking US forces out of key locations in their respective areas, but the Stingray could increase the range of US carrier-based aircraft indefinitely, allowing them to burst enemy A2AD bubbles.

For instance, China's famous DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has a range of about 810 miles. The US's longest-range carrier-based aircraft only have a range of about 550 miles, which forces the US to either operate carrier-based aircraft outside of their effective range or risk bringing an entire carrier, with 6,000 sailors and about 70 aircraft, within range of the DF-21D.

The Stingray, once integrated into carrier fleets, will extend the range of US carrier's existing F-18s, allowing them to effectively operate from a safe distance.

Once fielded, the Navy will look to increase the role of the Stingray.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#8  How much different is it between the deploymeny or basing of BMD/BMAADS-capable "Super-AEGIS" surface warfare vessels in Japan, wid China fitting out large ocean carriers wid DF-21/26 VLMS
What was the difference between a PERSHING INF capable of striking Moscow as easily as striking a Soviet tank division(s) attacking the Fulda Gap???

Submarines are "revenge" weapons, i.e. "third strike" + higher, NUCLEAR OR NON-NUCLEAR ARSENAL/FIRESHIPS are meant to confront the enemy from hour one of day one, i.e. "second strike" or lower.

Why should the US put ALCMS on 747's but China can't put anti-CVN ASCMS on same???

LETS GET REAL, PEOPLE!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2016-07-22 22:35  

#7  See also WAFF > [Weibo.com = pics] PLAAF H-6K STRATEGIC BOMBER FLYS BY PHILIPPINES IN SOUTH CHINA SEA.

POSTER/BLOGGER = argued that China has enough LRBM missles to force any + all US Military forces from East Asia, from SOKOR to GUAM.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2016-07-22 22:10  

#6  I hear roumors of a proposed CFT-18, COD (small packages), gas hauler and fierce dawg fighter.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-07-22 13:17  

#5  Could have saved a double-armed buttload of money and just hung Buddy Stores on the (antiquated) Intruders as dedicated tankers. birds had just got new plastic wings and now they sit in Davis-Mothan....KA-6Ds and A-6Es co-existed for years on the flight decks until the damn Light Attack Mafia started to diversify....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2016-07-22 12:36  

#4  
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2016-07-22 12:25  

#3  Hopefully the drone is stealthy.
Posted by: gorb   2016-07-22 10:35  

#2  Lasers are for Sharks, buddy! Sheesh! Pay attention! Stingrays get the Universal Destructo-Matic Boomhead.
Posted by: Skunky Ulomorong1761   2016-07-22 09:41  

#1  With a name like 'Stingray', couldn't you just put a friggin laser on its head?
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2016-07-22 09:15  

00:00