You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Pilots to Test Fix for F-35 Helmet ‘Green Glow' Problem
2016-08-17
ABOARD THE USS GEORGE WASHINGTON -- In coming days, five test pilots here will begin conducting night trials with a new software load for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter helmet that they believe will spell the end to a troubling issue.

Adjustments that decrease the contrast of the Generation III helmet-mounted display should allow pilots of the F-35C to land on aircraft carriers without having their view obscured by the display's ambient light, said Tom Briggs, acting chief test engineer for the Navy.

The service tried out a different fix on its last round of carrier tests aboard the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in 2015, but test pilots ultimately concluded they hadn't completely solved the issue.

"You could describe it as looking through a dirty window," Briggs said. "It's not so bad on a really bright night. On a dark night it skewers outside light references for pilots. A pilot cannot pick up the lights on the carrier as well as he'd like to, he doesn't necessarily pick up non-lighted signals on the ship as he's taxiing around, he has a harder time picking out aircraft that are flying around."

At $400,000 apiece, the F-35's helmet is as high-tech as the aircraft itself, with display features that let pilots "see" through the plane's skin and receive constantly updated information on the visor. The "green glow" problem with this visor display obscuring the field beyond it in dark conditions was first reported in 2012.

Briggs said two pilots had reported good results in an initial test with the new helmet update and officials were hopeful they have found the right solution. It's especially crucial that this round of fixes works because the Navy is beginning to conduct carrier qualifications for operational pilots as well as test pilots on the F-35C, and they won't be able to complete night qualifications until the problem is resolved.

Capt. James Christie, commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron-101, which had 12 pilot-instructors complete daytime carrier qualifications on the F-35C this week, said he hoped software updates would be approved and close to being retrofitted to all F-35 helmets by the end of the year.

Christie said the decreased contrast setting is likely to help all pilots who operate in especially dark environments, without aid from the 'cultural light' of nearby cities. But on carriers out in the middle of the ocean, it was crucial.

"I think we just kind of stomped our feet and said, "we need to have this to be safe around the ship,'" he said.

Briggs said nighttime helmet tests were expected to kick off Aug. 20, during the darkest phase of the moon.

"So we're going to go out on a really dark night and we're going to do our final evaluation on the green glow," he said. "And we think that that problem is solved."

The third and final round of carrier tests for the F-35C will continue until Aug. 23. The aircraft, which will be used by both the Navy and the Marine Corps for carrier operations, is expected to reach initial operational capability near the end of 2018.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#12  400K is 100X any reasonable cost for a helmet with a display and a sound system, I don't care how advanced.
Posted by: KBK   2016-08-17 22:54  

#11  Must eat at the same restaurant as those jokers who designed the last washer and dryer installation I was on.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-08-17 18:43  

#10  HUD afterglow?
I suppose they could close their eyes.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-08-17 18:05  

#9  I take it back SPOD it's not part of the fusion system.
Thanks for the info.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-08-17 12:51  

#8  Took a few techies to make sure the idiot Spey and friends didn't leave the radar off the F-16.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-08-17 12:37  

#7  SPOD no. The logistics pack tracks everything outside the aircraft as well. Logistics is a bad name for it, sensor fusion is better.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-08-17 12:35  

#6  Perhaps the basic airframe of the F-35 is a good airplane, capable of doing everything they claim it can do.

Unfortunately the techies have loaded a good airframe up with a bunch of goobledegook software and avionics features that pilots don't need and only the REMFs want. Last I checked, the major hold up on the F-35 was that goshawful logistics software that monitored every nut bolt and screw on the poor beast and gave a running spit out of things to fix and parts to order...methinks the logistics package is the big boondoggle here.

The essence of a good weapons system is to keep it simple and easy to repair...how many MIT PhDs in computer science are going to be needed to do first echelon diagnostics on the software?
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2016-08-17 11:40  

#5  Maybe they could put little tiny JATOs on the helmets to help during ejection?
Posted by: gorb   2016-08-17 11:20  

#4  On a dark night it skewers outside light references for pilots.

Skewers, eh? With electronic chopsticks one assumes? A legion of editors strike again...

What about the high-g load these early helmets are putting on the pilots during ejection?
Posted by: magpie   2016-08-17 08:29  

#3  Graft comes first, all other concerns are secondary.

The more graft the more contractors etc. involved the more complexity the more points of failure.

Worked for 3 months on the IS suite for Naval Air in Patuxent and the internal politicing was insane.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-08-17 07:34  

#2  Designed by a committee.

Apparently of non-pilots.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2016-08-17 02:06  

#1  A $400K helmet with no light dimmer switch? What's up with that?
Posted by: Raj   2016-08-17 00:24  

00:00