You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Oil companies paid off Gov. Brown for favorable regulations.
2016-08-18
SANTA MONICA, Calif., Aug. 10, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Public interest group Consumer Watchdog today reported that twenty-six energy companies including the state’s three major investor-owned utilities, Occidental, Chevron, and NRG—all with business before the state—donated $9.8 million to Jerry Brown’s campaigns, causes, and initiatives, and to the California Democratic Party since he ran for Governor. Donations were often made within days or weeks of winning favors. The three major investor-owned utilities alone contributed nearly $6 million.

An exhaustive review of campaign records, publicly-released emails and other documents at PUCPapers.org, court filings, and media reports, shows that Brown personally intervened in regulatory decisions favoring the energy industry, and points to Brown and his operatives having used the Democratic Party as a political slush fund to receive contributions from unpopular energy companies in amounts greater than permitted to his candidate committee. Between 2011 and 2014, the energy companies tracked by Brown’s Dirty Hands donated $4.4 million to the Democratic Party, and the Democratic Party gave $4.7 million to Brown’s re-election. Earmarking to the Democratic Party is illegal. Consumer Watchdog is forwarding its report to the Fair Political Practices Commission.

“The timing of energy industry donations around important legislation and key pro-industry amendments, as well as key regulatory decisions in which Brown personally intervened, raises troubling questions about whether quid pro quos are routine for this administration,” said consumer advocate Liza Tucker, author of the report, Brown’s Dirty Hands. “While Brown paints himself as a foe of fossil fuels, his Administration promoted reckless oil drilling, burning dirty natural gas to make electricity, and used old hands from industry and government, placed in key regulatory positions, to protect the fossil fuel-reliant energy industry.”

Posted by:badanov

#11  That's just it; and at first they didn't other than normal construction costs.

But, The People, probably KU students and affluent proto-hippies, raised such a stink the council, an elected position, made such a counter-popular decision to continue with the Wal Mart construction, it was what The People accused them of...it was so bad, I would talk to someone in the area and they would lead the conversation with Can You BELIEVE those bastards are letting that Wal Mart be built? To me, though, it was the only thing which made sense, but I'm of the Rodney Dangerfield Back to School. School.

Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-08-18 20:27  

#10  #9

Yeah, but why should Walmart have to *bribe* anyone to build a store? I've seen it from the opposite side too--liberal city councils attempt to obstruct legitimate businesses all in the name of "preserving downtown" or "neighborhood standards".
Posted by: Crusader   2016-08-18 19:49  

#9  The advocacy groups raise the price and gives cover.

Nice, straight forward example - Lawrence KS vs. Wal-Mart.

Lawrence, aka Berkley on Kaw, was petitioned by Wal Mart to build a new store and was initially agreed upon...then suddenly there were the people's uprising, No to Wal-Mart! booo never never! Suddenly, the zoning was suspended, no new Wal Mart.

The people had won! Power to the People!

Well, a couple months later, the zoning was re-approved. Yeah, it had to be away from the high school, have a fancy façade, hire a certain number of youngsters, face saving stuff.

Well, The People were shocked, betrayed. What are they famously called....useful idiots? Any rate, it begs the question - what sort of donations did the councils' spouse's hobby collect?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-08-18 18:18  

#8  A chip off the old block!
Posted by: Secret Master   2016-08-18 18:18  

#7  Is this why we are losing to the Left? Are we just being outbid by lefty advocacy groups? Have the oil companies (once again) shown us the way?
Posted by: Iblis   2016-08-18 15:14  

#6  Business as usual in Sacramento.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2016-08-18 11:06  

#5  It's for The Cause, y'know.
Posted by: Pappy   2016-08-18 10:59  

#4  Ever notice that the one time liberals don't see economics as a zero-sum game is when it comes to lining their pockets while in office...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2016-08-18 07:52  

#3  I'm pleased to see a green socialist "consumer advocate" attacking Gov. Moonbeam.
Posted by: Bobby   2016-08-18 07:39  

#2  Oil companies paid off Gov. Brown for favorable regulations.

Duh...

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2016-08-18 05:03  

#1  Oil companies (among others) donate to ALL the major candidates, to make sure whoever wins owes them.
Posted by: Glenmore   2016-08-18 00:50  

00:00