You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Creepy thought experiment: What if we go into the election with one candidate?
2016-09-01
[Hot Air] It's not even Labor Day yet, so we've got some time to while away until the general election in November. With that in mind, let's pause to think the formerly unthinkable. (Or at least the unlikely.) What happens if we get right up to the final couple of weeks before everyone heads to the polls and we suddenly only have one major party candidate still standing and in competition? That's the rather odd, but at least theoretically possible question posited by Steven Nelson at US News and World Report this week. The possible answers seem to range from nothing much with the process moving forward as it normally does to a delayed election or one which takes place without anyone voting.

The presidential election could be delayed or scrapped altogether if conspiracy theories become predictive and a candidate dies or drops out before Nov. 8. The perhaps equally startling alternative, if there’s enough time: Small groups of people hand-picking a replacement pursuant to obscure party rules.

The scenarios have been seriously considered by few outside of the legal community and likely are too morbid for polite discussion in politically mixed company. But prominent law professors have pondered the effects and possible ways to address a late-date vacancy.

"There’s nothing in the Constitution which requires a popular election for the electors serving in the Electoral College," says John Nagle, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, meaning the body that officially elects presidents could convene without the general public voting.

"It’s up to each state legislature to decide how they want to choose the state’s electors," Nagle says. "It may be a situation in which the fact that we have an Electoral College, rather than direct voting for presidential candidates, may prove to be helpful."

To get the obvious point out of the way, this discussion is clearly pinging off of two theories which are popular in certain corners of the social media swamp these days. One holds that Hillary Clinton is actually so incredibly ill that she’s virtually at death’s doorstep and could kick the bucket before November 8th. The other is that Donald Trump is a Manchurian Candidate for the Democrats and he’ll throw in the towel and walk away before anyone gets a chance to vote for him. But even if you subscribe to one (or both?) of these ideas, what happens next?
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Dear Internet:

Can we stop it with the massive, massive overuse of the word 'creepy' before I bash all of your fucking skulls in?

Thanks a lot.

Well, since you asked so politely...
Posted by: Raj   2016-09-01 12:41  

#5  The ticket has two people on it for a reason. If Clinton/Kaine wins he takes the top office and they follow procedures on how to replace the VP.

The question is do folks give him a sympathy vote or do things implode because he has no ovaries.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2016-09-01 11:32  

#4  Is Obummer bucking for an actual 3 or 4th term? Now that's a scary thought. Where do you go from the current 3rd world banana republic lefty notion? Trump the last hope for salvaging the country from the dumper?
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-09-01 06:44  

#3  Tim Kaine would be a viable candidate, probably would get more votes then HRC.

Pence would also be a viable candidate.
Posted by: lord garth   2016-09-01 06:23  

#2  Perhaps they know something we don't?

IMO, they don't know something we do - a decent job is not a right.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-09-01 06:15  

#1  Could actually be a pretty good HRC strategy. Should her polls continue to plummet, early voting exits non-supportive, she bombs the debates, negatives increase on foundation and emails.... dropping out for medical reasons might be viable option. We should know very soon.

Obama's team appears to be 'holding in place.' One would think a few might find new jobs and opportunities No one appears to be moving on. Perhaps they know something we don't ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-09-01 06:01  

00:00