You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Harvard: Democratic Control is the Reason for the Sluggish US Economy
2016-09-19
[The Post] According to a new study from The Harvard Business School, the strong partisan government and the fact that Americans don’t trust political leaders as some of the reasons attributing to the slow growth in the economy.

"The U.S. political system was once the envy of many nations. Over the last two decades, however, it has become our greatest liability. Americans no longer trust their political leaders, and political polarization has increased dramatically. Americans are increasingly frustrated with the U.S. political system," according to the Harvard titled "Problems Unsolved and a Nation Divided."

The report also recommends that the best solution is to make sure the American economy s competitive with the rest of the world.

"U.S. competitiveness has been eroding since well before the Great Recession. America’s economic challenges are structural, not cyclical. The weak recovery reflects the erosion of competitiveness, as well as the inability to take the steps necessary to address growing U.S. weaknesses," writes the report.

This study just shows it is time for things to change. "The federal government has made no meaningful progress on the critical policy steps to restore U.S. competitiveness in the last decade or more," writes the report.

For the past decade, the Democrats have had control and consistently have block proposals that would encourage economic growth and competitiveness.

Investors.com points out eight plans to encourage an economic boost that were rejected by democrats including: to simplify the corporate tax code and lower the statutory rate, to move to a territorial tax system like all other leading nations, and to simplify and streamline regulation.

The Obama administration has stumped the growth of the nation, by not enacting any kind of corporate tax reform, by adding even more regulatory restrictions to businesses and by doubling the national debt.

Clinton will just be an extension of Obama, while Trump’s economic plan mimics what both The Harvard Business School report and the past proposals above recommend to fix the economy.
Posted by:Besoeker

#10  Wow. Impressed, sort of. Blind squirrel and all that jazz.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2016-09-19 19:15  

#9  "The weak recovery reflects the erosion of competitiveness"

In an era when the public sector is four times larger than it was two generations ago and the average public employee makes more than the average private one (30% more in CA) it has nothing to do with competitiveness.

The weak recovery is a purposeful thing done by the Democrats who want to keep the private sector weak and the public strong because they can then bribe public employees with large salaries for easy anxiety-free jobs in exchange for undying loyalty at the voting booth.

If the private economy were to recover and become robust, people would leave public employment and vote against big government. The Dems aren't about to let that happen.
Posted by: no mo uro   2016-09-19 16:10  

#8  This is because of the rise of the political Left;
True Raj but I think you're off on the date by about 100 years. The rise of the left started with Woodrow Wilson and became entrenched with FDR. It grew slowly after that. There were the policies of LBJ then the total conversion of the Demos with the likes of "Clean Gene" McCarthy and George McGovern completed the cleansing of any moderate or conservatives from the party.

Jimmuh made it worse and then Clinton put it on steroids.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-09-19 12:46  

#7  Expect the Harvard Business School to soon be audited and they will lose multiple grants.

Can't have people going off the reservation and thinking and stating non approved topics.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-09-19 12:35  

#6   ...and political polarization has increased dramatically.

This is because of the rise of the political Left; it started during Clinton's presidency and went warp factor 8 during Obama's tenure.

This study just shows it is time for things to change.

Fuck this fucking talk about fucking 'change' - how about 'improvement' and shit like that? You know, positive things?

For the past decade, the Democrats have had control and consistently have block proposals that would encourage economic growth and competitiveness.

It's been a lot longer than that, dickheads.

...and to simplify and streamline regulation.

Hell no - get rid of some, or a lot, of it, first and foremost is Obamacare. Oh - and get people off welfare and into full-time jobs.
Posted by: Raj   2016-09-19 12:33  

#5  Or, quoting James Kunstler today:
The rackets and swindles unleashed in our futile quest to keep up appearances have disabled the financial operating system that the regime depends on. It’s all an illusion sustained by accounting fraud to conceal promises that won’t be kept. All the mighty efforts of central bank authorities to borrow “wealth” from the future in the form of “money” — to “paper over” the absence of growth — will not conceal the impossibility of paying that borrowed money back. The future’s revenge for these empty promises will be the disclosure that the supposed wealth is not really there — especially as represented in currencies, stock shares, bonds, and other ephemeral “instruments” designed to be storage vehicles for wealth. The stocks are not worth what they pretend. The bonds will never be paid off. The currencies will not store value. How did this happen? Slowly, then all at once.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2016-09-19 12:29  

#4  Our oligarchs got theirs. The rest of us just don't matter.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2016-09-19 12:20  

#3  "The federal government has made no meaningful progress on the critical policy steps to restore U.S. competitiveness in the last decade or more." That's not a fluke, that's the plan.
Posted by: JohnQC   2016-09-19 08:35  

#2  Federal 'Rules and Regulations' were not intended to accomplish solutions, but rather to establish control.

The 'irredeemable deplorables' are incapable of functioning without strict measures of control. I was certain everyone knew that.

[sarc off]
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-09-19 06:53  

#1  "The federal government has made no meaningful progress on the critical policy steps to restore U.S. competitiveness in the last decade or more,"

Just the opposite with decrees and regulations that destroy industry and add costs.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-09-19 06:45  

00:00