| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Monica Crowley: How Trump can knock out Hillary in the first debate |
| 2016-09-22 |
| BLUF: [Wash Times] First, he should emphasize his pragmatic vision for turning America around: moving to pro-growth economics, restoring law and order, rebuilding the military and a strong national defense, reigniting America’s influence and prestige internationally, and defeating the corrupt, rigged system (as embodied by Mrs. Clinton). As a successful presidential candidate, he must offer voters a positive, compelling reason to vote for him, rather than just against his opponent. That’s why it’s critical for Mr. Trump to focus on his restorative agenda for the country. Second, as a compliment to his optimistic vision, he must smash Mrs. Clinton, both as a failed "leader" pushing failed policies and a destructive leftist ideology and as a deeply corrupt individual who cannot -- must not -- be trusted with the presidency. She will try to swarm him with policy details to try to demonstrate that he’s unprepared for the highest office in the land. She’ll try to sit above the fray, winking that she’s "been there, done that." Well, yes. But the question is not whether she was in the game. It’s how she played it -- and what results she produced. For her, the result was evermore power and a net worth of over $125 million. For the country, the result is that we are less wealthy, less prosperous, less safe, less secure, less powerful. Mr. Trump doesn’t have to show an encyclopedic knowledge of every policy nuance. He simply has to point to the wreckage of the Obama economy and foreign policy and say: "We tried it your way." Mic drop. Third, he should "gaslight" her (hat tip to Alfred Hitchcock) by remaining totally cool and unflappable while calmly pushing on her vulnerabilities, from her disgraceful lack of integrity to her hypocrisy concerning women to standing by silently if she’s seized by one of her interminable coughing attacks. This must be done with the greatest care, taking the Reagan approach of regarding her more in sorrow than in anger: "There you go again." And he should call her Mrs. Clinton in order to link her to the deeply flawed boy who brought her to the dance. For all of the talk about Mr. Trump’s alleged "thin skin," she is extraordinarily prickly. She has never faced a tough election fight or been questioned aggressively or criticized to her face. If Mr. Trump can get under her thin skin, he could provoke a caustic response that will reveal the cosseted elitist behind the frozen smile. Witness candidate Barack Obama’s calmly delivered 2008 crack, "You’re likeable enough, Hillary." The steam came out of her ears for days. Finally, Mr. Trump must be a happy warrior. Most voters want to believe that he’s the guy not just to fix the country -- but to restore their optimism with it. They want to know that he will fight the war for America’s future not as a burden but as a joyful privilege. If he can exuberantly convey that America can be saved -- and that she is worth saving -- he will not just win the debate but perhaps the election. Into the ring they go. And in this ultimate reality show, we’ll all be watching what happens live. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #6 She is power hungry and that blinds her to just about everything else except money. She'd throw us all under the bus for a buck of less. I've noticed she lies a lot too (sarcasm). |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2016-09-22 15:16 |
| #5 I had a debate with an old friend the other day and his defense of her actions in Libya got down to "the French tricked her into destabalizing Libya." His defense of her vote in favor of the Iraq war got down to W tricked her into voting for his war. Which leads me to the obvious conclusion that she's fairly easily tricked isn't she. Two main things on her resume and she botched them because she was tricked. Not really Presidential. I choose the devil I don't know to the one I'm certain is a devil. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2016-09-22 14:39 |
| #4 Ima flying dropkick sort myself... |
| Posted by: Raj 2016-09-22 11:34 |
| #3 How about a hard right hook to the chops? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2016-09-22 10:39 |
| #2 good point airandee the Hillary camp are afraid the Hilbot will break down by the end of the debate -- if it has too much water, it will need a maintenance break -- too little water and it overheats |
| Posted by: lord garth 2016-09-22 08:51 |
| #1 Before any answer Trump she ask Hillary "are you ok? Do you need a break? Do you need to sit down? Do you need an EMT?....." |
| Posted by: Airandee 2016-09-22 06:28 |