You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Climate activists terrorists shut off oil pipelines which provide 15% of daily US consumption
2016-10-13
[Reuters] All it took was a pair of bolt cutters and the elbow grease of a few climate activists to carry out an audacious act of sabotage on North America's massive oil and gas pipeline system.

For an industry increasingly reliant on gadgets such as digital sensors, infrared cameras and drones to monitor security and check for leaks, the sabotage illustrated how vulnerable pipelines are to low-tech attacks.

On Tuesday, climate activists broke through fences and cut locks and chains simultaneously in several states and simply turned the pipelines off.

All they had to do was twist shut giant valves on five cross-border pipelines that together can send 2.8 million barrels a day of crude to the United States from Canada - equal to about 15 percent of daily U.S. consumption.

The activists did no damage to the pipelines, which operating companies shut down as a precaution for checks before restarting.

The United States is the world's largest energy market, and the infrastructure to drill, refine, store and deliver that energy to consumers is connected by millions of miles of pipeline that are impossible to protect entirely from attack.

"You're not manning these things on a permanent basis. It's not viable," said Stewart Dewar, a project manager at Senstar, an Ottawa-based company that authored a 2012 white paper on pipeline security. "It's too expensive."

There are more than 200,000 miles (322,000 km) of oil lines and many times that of natural gas lines across the United States. Thousands of rural and often remote pumping and valve stations dot the country.

The cost of posting armed guards at valve stations, usually found every 20 miles along the underground pipelines, would be prohibitive, said Dewar.

For companies, there are few options to police the parts of their pipeline networks that sit above ground, such as the valve stations.
Posted by:Besoeker

#16  "..."You're not manning these things on a permanent basis. It's not viable," said Stewart Dewar, a project manager at Senstar, an Ottawa-based company that authored a 2012 white paper on pipeline security. "It's too expensive...."

Not so expensive in 2016. An integrated system of cameras, barriers, drones, satellites would be about 25% of the cost of a similar but not-as-good integrated system in 2012.
Posted by: lord garth   2016-10-13 21:58  

#15  Shoot, shovel and shut up.
Posted by: Angetch Lumplump6105   2016-10-13 17:18  

#14  Put alligators inside the fence and feed them every three days.
Posted by: gorb   2016-10-13 15:12  

#13  Didn't Tom Clancy's "Red Storm Rising" (WW3) begin with an attack on pipelines in a refinery?

Its national defense infrastructure. Treat it as such. Better fences, maybe electric and some concertina. Remote monitoring. I'd pony up a couple pennies a gallon to cover operating it.
Posted by: OldSpook   2016-10-13 15:06  

#12  Well, if you believe that climate change is as bad as the liberals do, this sort of thing would be warranted. Heroic, even! I suppose that'll be their legal defense.
Posted by: Bobby   2016-10-13 13:17  

#11  Cars? Those things that run on petroleum? (or coal or uranium)
Posted by: SteveS   2016-10-13 11:52  

#10  Well, they probably didn't go far. They must have walked to the site, since using a car would contribute to global warming.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2016-10-13 11:50  

#9  Hang them from the pipeline.

Posted by: DarthVader   2016-10-13 09:43  

#8  Take note how easy it is. You can't protect it all. If and when a civil war breaks out, a lot of places are going to be without. NIMBY will bite deep.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-10-13 09:22  

#7  WM, RC, shooting is too quick unless you start at the ankles and work your way up slowly.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-10-13 08:41  

#6  I'm with Whiskey Mike -- they're endangering lives by playing with systems they don't understand. Shoot them.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2016-10-13 08:30  

#5  I would shoot them.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2016-10-13 08:24  

#4   Shoving bolt cutters up someone's arse would quickly solve this bad habit.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-10-13 08:00  

#3  Does the fact that this involves interstate / international commerce make this a federal crime? Or is it a guaranteed ticket to the Obama WH?
Posted by: DepotGuy    2016-10-13 07:43  

#2  Say Thank You Lord this kind of attacks do not appeal to Islamic mentality (not enough blood).
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-10-13 07:40  

#1  More than a few years back the enviros attacked the logging industry out west. They succeeded in avoiding arrest for a time. When caught, they were severely punished. Attacks then ceased.
Posted by: Shick de Medici6262   2016-10-13 07:39  

00:00