You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
Taqiyya: White House Warns Against Blaming Religion of Islam After Ohio State Attack
2016-11-30
This is not ignorance, it is promotion of the evil embraced by leftists. Not only do you not protect the people against Islam it you actively import it for various reason.
[Breitbart] The Obama Administration is warning America not to cast blame on Muslims after a student at Ohio State University launched an attack on innocent civilians that was likely inspired by Islamic State terrorists.

"Our response to this situation matters," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest explained to reporters during the press briefing. "If we respond to this situation by casting aspersions on millions of people that adhere to a particular religion or if we increase our suspicion of people who practice a particular religion, we are more likely going to contribute to acts of violence than we are to prevent them.
Posted by:Glutle Thrineque6542

#13  JUST POST THE DAMN SCREEN CAPTURE OF THE PERP'S FACEBOOK RANT

Look here, Anguper Hupomosing9418. Screen capture and transcription, for the hard of seeing. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-11-30 22:28  

#12  Not much different than Tory vs. Whig, or Catholic vs. Protestant as exercises in political expressionism.

Apparently your world history starts about two hundred years ago.
Posted by: Pappy   2016-11-30 20:37  

#11  JUST POST THE DAMN SCREEN CAPTURE OF THE PERP'S FACEBOOK RANT
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2016-11-30 17:20  

#10  Remember who are the people who broad brush fundamental Christians after a fire or bombing at an abortion clinic or legal gun owners after a shooting by a punk or felon.

One set of rules for me, another set of rules for thee.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-11-30 13:37  

#9  C'mon, really?
if we increase our suspicion of people who practice a particular religion, we are more likely going to contribute to acts of violence than we are to prevent them

I abhor the thought (now fact) that the best minds of Rantburg are presenting justifying rational based upon an oral, historical (hysterical) mythology that has been repeated and corrupted over a span of more than 50 generation.

A belief system, sure, as credible and verifiable as "Frodo lives!" or rain frogs breed in clouds.

This is a minority subculture becoming mainstream thanks in part to the ease of travel and information flow. Its followers may have been rooted in a oppressed, protein deprived nomadic society but the organic causes of current violent acts have nothing to do with religion. That is simply a framework for the primitive expression of 'them not like us' embraced by the disenfranchised seeking group identity. Violence binds haters and provides them a cause.

Not much different than Tory vs. Whig, or Catholic vs. Protestant as exercises in political expressionism.

In any case, 'the whiney shits are fucking with the way I chose to live my life'. If they can't be reasonable their lifelights can be extinguished.




/rantoff
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-11-30 12:38  

#8  "Our response to this situation matters,

CORRECT!!!!

The problem for you bozos is defining the correct response. The correct response involves not letting vermin into the pantry and trapping the ones that get in anyway.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-11-30 12:30  

#7  procopius

you are right - several villages, clans and tribes were exterminated

see this site

Posted by: lord garth   2016-11-30 11:24  

#6  What g(r)omgoru said. This one is on Baraq. You can't blame rattlesnakes for biting people but you can blame the evil bastard who brings them into the house.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2016-11-30 11:14  

#5  ISIS wants credit, and the attacker said in his own words it was about not have prayer rooms and such so I'm leaning towards blaming ISLAM for the attack. But thanks for the notes.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2016-11-30 11:12  

#4  "If we respond to this situation by casting aspersions on millions of people that adhere to a particular religion or if we increase our suspicion of people who practice a particular religion, we are more likely going to contribute to acts of violence than we are to prevent them"

"With other situations, religions, and people, it's appropriate though."
Posted by: Pappy   2016-11-30 08:43  

#3  Another excuse for people following the actions of Mohammad declared as non-Islamic. Didn't he put a village or two of non-believers to the sword/knife?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-11-30 08:42  

#2  We don't blame Islam for the Ohio State attack, we blame you.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-11-30 08:41  

#1  I believe we've moved well beyond 'suspicion.'

I look forward to seeing Josh Earnest move on with his life in the January time frame.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-11-30 08:24  

00:00