You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Pentagon reportedly buried study exposing $125 billion in waste
2016-12-06
Only $125B in waste? Or is it that the study that exposed this waste just happened to cost $125,001,000,000 and was only focused on itself?
Senior defense officials suppressed a study documenting $125 billion worth of administrative waste at the Pentagon out of fears that Congress would use its findings to cut the defense budget, the Washington Post reported late Monday.
Thereby subverting the will of the honest people's dishonest representatives?
The report, which was issued in January 2015 by the advisory Defense Business Board, called for a series of reforms that would have saved the department $125 billion over the next five years.
Here are my reforms:
1) Cancel LCS
2) Cancel F-35
3) Anybody who writes in to expose recurring waste, fraud, or abuse that they aren't part of gets 10% of what they expose for the year and those guilty get thrown in jail.

Among its other findings, the report showed that the Defense Department was paying just over 1 million contractors, civilian employees and uniformed personnel to fill back-office jobs. That number nearly matches the amount of active duty troops 1.3 billion, the lowest since 1940.
Make them sign up for the reserve. Then they're at risk of being put uniform and shipped overseas.
The Post reported that some Pentagon leaders feared the study's findings would undermine their claims that years of budget sequestration had left the military short of money. In response, they imposed security restrictions on information used in the study and even pulled a summary report from a Pentagon website.

"They’re all complaining that they don’t have any money," former Defense Business Board chairman Robert Stein told the Post. "We proposed a way to save a ton of money."

Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work, who originally ordered the study, told the paper that the plan laid out in the report was "unrealistic."

"There is this meme that we’re some bloated, giant organization," Work said. "Although there is a little bit of truth in that ... I think it vastly overstates what’s really going on.

Work claimed that some of the report's recommendations were being implemented on a smaller scale and would save an estimated $30 billion by 2020. However, the Post reported that most of the programs had been long-planned or unreleated to the Defense Business Board report.
Posted by:gorb

#4  Hey, I'll nominate that we go back the the WWII ratio of general officers to enlisted.

You know, if we only had 5 general officers, being a colonel would become more important (and who you choose for the rank as well). See - grade inflation
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-12-06 12:57  

#3  Like always, it is the administrative dead weight that needs cut first.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-12-06 10:48  

#2  Among its other findings, the report showed that the Defense Department was paying just over 1 million contractors, civilian employees and uniformed personnel to fill back-office jobs. That number nearly matches the amount of active duty troops 1.3 billion, the lowest since 1940.

You know there are only about 330 million in the whole American population (-/+ 10 million or so illegals)?

Besides, the 'work load' doesn't match 1940 levels. So, they suggest instead of having volunteer military we draft civilians again to do grass cutting, chow hall duties, and other non-military assorted details at well below minimum wage. Again you'll have drugs, AWOL and all those wonderful fun times not being an army but daycare for Snowflakes and other assorted misfits of the culture.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-12-06 09:26  

#1  Sorry, forgot to file this under non-WoT, but maybe it sort of belongs here . . . .
Posted by: gorb   2016-12-06 00:29  

00:00