Oh the stupid is strong with this one
[Medium.com] For the dense, let me just state unequivocally up front that I do not support this plan, and I do not advocate that violent measures be used to stop Trump. That said, there are innumerable high-profile pundits and political figures who have characterized the threat Trump poses as unprecedented. Many have thrown around the word "fascist." If that's your view of Trump, that he's not just a garden variety-level threat ‐ the kind we should be accustomed to by dint of living in a rapidly declining hegemonic imperial prison state ‐ but something exponentially more destructive and terrifying, then certain previously-unthinkable preventive tactics would be warranted.
Assuming the average cock splash of a liberal is trained in anything more than yelling and waving signs
If I took this view of Trump, and was able-bodied, here's what I'd do to prove that I actually believe my own rhetoric, rather than just spout alarmist nonsense for political effect.
I'd assemble armed resistance brigades in and around states that voted for Trump. I'd make sure the participants are well-trained in urban combat. I'd do drills. I'd ensure that secure communications have been established to enable inter-state coordination. I'd impart to participants that they should be prepared to face severe state punishment for their rebellious acts‐ perhaps even death.
These are called "militias". Currently, people you call "right wing" are involved in such organizations. Also another flaw in the plan is to assume your gun controlling spunk wastes would actually have guns and be trained in their use.
Another stupid assumption is that "urban warfare" thingy. What happens when you storm the Winter Palace and there's nobody there? Your heroic urban guerrilleros could find themselves without water, light, and a few other things, since they're supplied from the 'burbs. You know that lefty saying about "what if they gave a war and nobody came?" How about what if they gave a war and somebody turned the power off. It's not hard to reinvent siege warfare if you get good and pissed.
The plan would be as such. The brigades would position at Republican state capitals (Harrisburg PA, Lansing MI, Raleigh NC, etc.) where the Electoral College is due to meet on December 19. I'd make sure every Elector expected to vote for Trump is identified. The night of December 18, the brigades would forge a blockade at the various state capitol buildings. Electors identified as Republican and/or Trump supporters would be physically prevented from entering, if necessary by lethal force. It's possible that Electors would scramble to meet someplace other than the state capitol building; the resistance must take precautions to ensure this does not happen, possibly by physically restraining the Electors, imprisoning them, or worse.
News flash... the "militias" and common gun toting citizen would shoot your asses down faster than you can say "Not my president".
"Active shooters" also tend to get bumped off by responding police. Preventing the electors from gathering would put the election into the House.
If this is carried out successfully in enough Republican state capitals, Trump will fail to receive the requisite 270 electoral votes, and the election would be decided in the House of Representatives. Who the hell knows what would happen at that point.
Full scale civil war and the slaughter of your gun control loving idiots. Next question.
Again: I don't support the enactment of this plan. In fact, I vigorously oppose it. However, if I took the extreme view of Trump that so many in our media class do, I'd see it as morally obligatory.
I see you as intellectually wanting and not in this realm called "reality", but go ahead. Try it. I dare you.