You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Did Sweden Make America's Nuclear Submarines Obsolete?
2016-12-31
[The National Interest] Nuclear-powered submarines have traditionally held a decisive edge in endurance, stealth and speed over cheaper diesel submarines. However, new Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) technology has significantly narrowed the performance gap on a new generation of submarines that cost a fraction of the price of a nuclear-powered boat.

A conventional submarine’s diesel engine generates electricity which can be used to drive the propeller and power its systems. The problem is that such a combustion engine is inherently quite noisy and runs on air--a commodity in limited supply on an underwater vehicle. Thus, diesel-powered submarines must surface frequently to recharge their batteries.

The first nuclear-powered submarines were brought into service in the 1950s. Nuclear reactors are quieter, don’t consume air, and produce greater power output, allowing nuclear submarines to remain submerged for months instead of days while traveling at higher speeds under water.

These advantages led the U.S. Navy to phase out its diesel boats in favor of an all-nuclear powered submarine fleet. However, most other navies have retained at least some diesel submarines because of their much lower cost and complexity.

In the 1990s, submarines powered by Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) technology entered operational use. Though the concept dated back to the 19th century and had been tested in a few prototype vessels, it was left to Sweden to deploy the first operational AIP-powered submarine, the Gotland-class, which proved to be stealthy and relatively long enduring. The 60-meter long Gotlands are powered by a Stirling-cycle engine, a heat engine consuming a combination of liquid oxygen and diesel fuel.

Since then, AIP powered-submarines have proliferated across the world using three different types of engines, with nearly 60 operational today in fifteen countries. Around fifty more are on order or being constructed.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  But "journalists" love writing "American (fill in the blank) obsolete..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2016-12-31 19:45  

#5  The key phrase in the article is "relatively long enduring". Relative to what? Ordinary diesel submarines? The only limitation on a nuclear sub is food supplies. They can go out and stay submerged for months, not days or weeks. And they can go faster submerged than surfaced.

I'm not saying that AIP subs are useless or not a threat. I just don't think they make nuclear subs "obsolete".
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2016-12-31 14:28  

#4  Liquid OXygen very dangerous stuff. Anything will burn in pure oxygen atmosphere. Diesel, metal, people...
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2016-12-31 13:37  

#3  Ed's comments and questions at #2 are why I enjoy the Burg dialogue. There is always something to be learned.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-12-31 12:11  

#2  Other pertinent questions:
So they carry diesel fuel, how much?
So their range and speed is how little?
So they release their exhaust stream as a bubble trail that can be heard on passive sonar how far away?
The take away is they're functionally diesel electrics, suitable for shallow, coastal work, not deep dive or far transit.
Posted by: ed in texas   2016-12-31 12:04  

#1  So they carry LOX, how much?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-12-31 11:34  

00:00