You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Clapper calls for U.S. Information Agency ‘on steroids' to counter Russian propaganda
2017-01-07
Perhaps title should actually read 'Jim Clapper on Steroids.'
[Wash Times] The nation’s top spy suggested Thursday that it would behoove the incoming administration to revive the defunct U.S. Information Agency, or USIA, as a bulwark against Moscow’s powerful propaganda operation.
But wait! I thought the current problem was cyber hacking and espionage? Wasn't the old USIA a diplomatic tool ?
"We could do with having a USIA on steroids to fight this information war [with Russia] a lot more aggressively than we’re doing right now," Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Resuscitating and revamping the agency, which was officially shuttered in 1999, and focusing the organization’s pro-U.S. messaging into social media networks would go a long way in countering Russian-sponsored media outlets like Russia Today and Sputnik, Mr. Clapper said.
Resuscitation of USIA? But Wikileaks has such a head start. It could take years, possibly decades. Wikileaks is the problem, right ?
"[Russia Today] was very active in promoting a particular point of view, disparaging our system, our alleged hypocrisy about human rights," he said. "Whatever crack, fissure they could find in our tapestry, they would exploit it," via the state-owned news network.
The Clinton 'tapestry' did not require a great deal of exploitation.
Currently the aging State Department-run Voice of America is the closest capability Washington has in offsetting Russia Today’s growing influence across the globe.
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  Remember, white propaganda is truth. So how do you fight white propaganda, with gray (misleading) or black (lies)? The Donks are already full spin on the latter. They don't need govt subsidizes.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-01-07 07:49  

#4  A Mark Dillen review of Nicholas Cull's, The Decline and Fall of the United States Information Agency: American Public Diplomacy found at this link.

About the author: "Mark Dillen is an international public affairs consultant. As a member of the Senior Foreign Service, he served as Political Minister Counselor at the US Embassy in Rome in 1999, when talks about a Loya Jirga were underway in Rome with Zahir Shah. Mark recently returned from Kabul, where for one year he was Communications Director for USAID and Executive Secretary for the USAID Mission."
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-01-07 07:38  

#3  Sounds, kinda, Sovietish - doesn't it?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-01-07 06:32  

#2  [Russia Today] was very active in promoting a particular point of view

So are most US news outlets. So what?
Posted by: phil_b   2017-01-07 05:05  

#1  Forget the Department of Defense, and the fact that we failed you in the past. We now need those new Trump defense dollars. Just ask Leon Panetta, Mike Morell, or Brennan !

Please hurry! We've already selected senior people and purchased desks.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-01-07 04:11  

00:00