You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Judge: San Francisco Can't Be Sued Over Death By Immigrant
2017-01-10
Time to sue the politicians directly.
San Francisco cannot be held liable for a slaying by a man who was in the country illegally and had been released by sheriff's officials despite a request by immigration officials to keep him behind bars, a federal judge said.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero dismissed wrongful death claims filed by the family of 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle against the city and Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi. The judge, however, allowed a negligence claim against the federal government to move forward.
Maybe Schumer can have the CIA do something about this.
Steinle's shooting death thrust San Francisco into the national debate over immigration
Sounds like SF doesn't want to debate anything. Just declare their immunity and carry on.
The man charged with murder in the July 2015 slaying, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, was a repeat drug offender who was transferred to the city jail to face a marijuana sales charge after he completed a federal prison sentence for illegally reentering the country. The district attorney dropped charges, and the sheriff's department released Lopez-Sanchez three months before Steinle's death, ignoring a request by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to keep him behind bars.

San Francisco's so-called "sanctuary policy" bars city employees from cooperating with federal immigration officials in deportation efforts.

Mirkarimi cited the law in a 2015 memo to deputies that prohibited them from providing certain information to federal immigration authorities, including the date an inmate is released, according to Spero's ruling. In their lawsuit, Steinle's family cited a statement by immigration authorities that Lopez-Sanchez would have been deported and Steinle's death prevented if sheriff's officials had notified them about his pending release.

Spero said in his ruling on Friday that neither the state nor federal law cited in the lawsuit prevents the sheriff from restricting his deputies' communications with immigration officials about an inmate's release date.

Frank Pitre, an attorney for the Steinle family, said he was evaluating the best course forward.
Wait ten days and talk to the next administration.
Spero allowed a claim in the lawsuit alleging that a U.S. Bureau of Land Management ranger negligently left the gun used in Steinle's slaying loaded inside a vehicle in San Francisco, and it was stolen.
Then the gun got out of the vehicle, hopped down the street, jumped into Juan's hand, and fired itself at Kate.
Lopez-Sanchez says he found the gun and it fired when he picked it up, striking Steinle in the back. He has pleaded not guilty to a second-degree murder charge.
Posted by:gorb

#1  I'd say there's wide interpretation to the 'Attractive Nuisance' doctrine.

You have an official tourist office to attract the 'deer' and then combine with sanctuary city policies to attract those with no regard to the law. Sees a good fit to me. Then again I'm not a nuance judge.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-01-10 06:32  

00:00