You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Nearly two-thirds of US Navy’s strike fighters can’t fly
2017-02-07
The U.S. Navy’s F/A-18 Hornet and Super Hornet strike fighters are the tip of the spear, embodying most of the fierce striking power of the aircraft carrier strike group. But nearly two-thirds of the fleet’s strike fighters can’t fly — grounded because they’re either undergoing maintenance or simply waiting for parts or their turn in line on the aviation depot backlog.

Overall, more than half the Navy’s aircraft are grounded, most because there isn’t enough money to fix them.

Additionally, there isn’t enough money to fix the fleet’s ships, and the backlog of ships needing work continues to grow. Overhauls — “availabilities” in Navy parlance — are being canceled or deferred, and when ships do come in they need longer to refit. Every carrier overall for at least three years has run long, and some submarines are out of service for prolonged periods, as much as four years or more. One submarine, the Boise, has lost its diving certification and can’t operate pending shipyard work.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  With that and the LCS, the U.S. Navy is deadlined.
Posted by: newc   2017-02-07 21:38  

#6  Fiscal year in the Navy starts in October each year. It's not unusual to see ships tied up at dock in September just sitting because the fuel allocation doesn't start until the end of the month.
It was bad this way in the 70's, got better in the 80's, and has headed down again.
Posted by: ed in texas   2017-02-07 18:29  

#5  Why not just take the money we're wasting on the UN and on various pointless wars and apply them to the military, with proper oversight!
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance   2017-02-07 18:27  

#4  Convenient timing as they are working the UFR to Trump right now.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2017-02-07 16:21  

#3  I agree with Spaise Slaitle1516...the Navy can not claim that their number 1 priority is readiness when they have a 47 per cent OR rate. Move money within the budget while asking for more.
Posted by: Tennessee   2017-02-07 10:30  

#2  Yet, the Navy found the money to build a multi-acre solar panel farm in Kings Bay, GA. If I remember correctly, it also found the money to use "green" fuel at much larger cost. So, how are all those neat rail guns going to work if the ship can't sail?
Posted by: Spaise Slaitle1516   2017-02-07 09:53  

#1  Nine years of starving the military. I wonder whose idea that was? Legacy Man?
Posted by: Bobby   2017-02-07 07:15  

00:00