You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Salon secretly deleted all pro-pedophile articles
2017-02-22
[AgeOfShitlords] For several years now, Salon has been trying to normalize pedophilia and to bring “pedo acceptance” into the mainstream. In one instance, they allowed a self-admitted pedophile by name “Todd Nickerson” to write op eds, asking for acceptance of pedophiles, who he argued, were different from child molesters.

The first article from Todd, titled “I’m a pedophile, but not a monster” tells the story of Todd, who claims to be sexually attracted to children but has never abused a child before. He wrote a follow-up article a week later titled “I’m a pedophile, you’re the monsters: My week inside the vile right-wing hate machine”.

Apparently, his previous Pedo article didn’t go over very well with right wingers, and he received some hateful messages and death threats from people he identified as “far right extremists”.

Today, both of those articles are no longer hosted on Salon.com. In the past two days alone, Salon has published three articles accusing Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos of condoning sex with minors, and they might have realized that their actions might seem hypocritical, coming from a website that frequently defended pedophilia. Trying to read any of the two articles directly will give you an “error 404” page, however, an archive of them can be found HERE and HERE.

Salon seems to have scrubbed their website entirely of any content relating to Todd the Pedo. Trying to view his profile or any of the articles he has written turns up a blank page.
More at the link
Posted by:badanov

#12  
When will "conservatives" learn that the cult of personality is a toxic dead end?


Seriously -- where the FUCK was the "cult of personality" around Milo? Because people believed he should be allowed to speak? Because people thought he was an interesting spokesman for a worthwhile position? Because people object to editing remarks to come out the opposite of what he actually said?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2017-02-22 21:52  

#11  Shocking for thee, but not for me: tape of George Takei laughing over having been molested at summer camp by his counsellor at age 13. What struck me is that he denied knowing he was gay before then.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-02-22 15:57  

#10  He wrote a follow-up article a week later titled “I’m a pedophile, you’re the monsters: My week inside the vile right-wing hate machine”.

He seems to know who his enemies are.
Posted by: gorb   2017-02-22 15:03  

#9  Milo was a victim when grown adult men had sexual encounters with him when Milo was in his early teens. Milo's words did him in--he attempted to claim that those encounters with grown men were mere "coming of age" encounters. That type of language isn't going to play well with.

In some respects, Milo was victimized anew by those same men who abused him as a teenager--his inability to process what those acts were rose up and bit him a couple of decades after the fact when he spoke his mind.
Posted by: Crusader   2017-02-22 10:23  

#8  "it's better that they have a pathway to help them never offend, and so we can identify them also, rather than have them hide in the shadows and maybe hurt some kid."

I'm willing to give them priority posting to the stations in Antarctica.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-02-22 09:43  

#7  Say it with me - Log Cabin Republicans. Crickets...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2017-02-22 09:38  

#6  DG is correct. "Society" as defined by the media arbiters demands that all sexual flavors be respected - except maybe your cis proclivities. Milo was a "pet" of a particular branch of the "conservative movement" the same way pisslamic extremists are pets to leftists who really hold no common cause with them except hatred for the west. Nothing more.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2017-02-22 09:32  

#5  milo never condoned sex with minors,...

Why yes...yes he did. Watch the vid.

...he was only talking about his own experience trying to figure out who he was.

No, no he wasn't. Again, watch the vid.

...he has to sack paul ryan get him out of there. these old RINO'S are feeding it


Lame deflection. This has nothing to do with Speaker Ryan. This is a sorted tale of another sexual deviant who advocates preying on children. Worse yet he excuses his fetishes by claiming they do these vile acts, get this, in benefit of the abused children. Ironically, as "proud" gay man he does a disservice to his community by associating molestation with homosexualality.
Posted by: DepotGuy    2017-02-22 08:36  

#4  Let me get this right. Woman by adult age have hair well beyond their cranial locks. Been that way for hundred thousand years or so. However, the contemporary culture has a fetish of shaving legs, underarms, and private areas. The only 'natural' state that reflects is very underage girls. Hmmmmmm...
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-02-22 08:35  

#3  Milo is gay Sawah Palin. Many were sucked in by his schtick. When will "conservatives" learn that the cult of personality is a toxic dead end?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2017-02-22 07:26  

#2  ps i will also say off that salon, i remember that todd article at least i think i do

if it is the one where some guy said 'i'm attracted to children, it's a terrible curse. I've never acted on it so i've hurt nobody and committed no crime - but there needs to be a support group for people like me so we can help each other to never commit crimes and to be productive normal people. We are born this way"

i think that was the gist that i remember

i don't think that's a bad thing or promoting pedophilia.

In a given population of 300 million , some people will be born pedophiles

it's better that they have a pathway to help them never offend, and so we can identify them also, rather than have them hide in the shadows and maybe hurt some kid.


it would save more kids. so i think it would be counter-productive to attack what essentially might be a good person who has been cursed with proclivities that are evil, but that he resisted.
Posted by: anon1   2017-02-22 06:16  

#1  milo never condoned sex with minors, he was only talking about his own experience figuring out who he was

he's made it worse by saying 'i'm a victim of abuse'

they're having a field day with him

and that op ed someone posted "if they get milo, you're next' was brilliant and spot on

they took down Flynn, now it's Milo, next it will be someone else till they tear trump admin and supporters apart.

he has to sack paul ryan get him out of there. these old RINOs are feeding it
Posted by: anon1   2017-02-22 06:11  

00:00