You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Cornel West Lacks 'Faith' in 'Progressive Vision' of Black Caucus
2017-02-28
[PJ] WASHINGTON ‐ Political activist Dr. Cornel West said he does not have a "tremendous amount of faith" in the "progressive vision" of the Congressional Black Caucus, telling PJM that he believes the group of lawmakers is on the wrong side of several issues.

West called for a "multi-racial coalition" that can work to "transform" America’s "capitalist civilization into a more democratic socialist one." He also said there should be a "more serious conversation" in the U.S. about reparations for descendants of African-American slaves.

In response to a question at a recent press conference, President Trump said he was open to meeting with the Congressional Black Caucus and the two parties are reportedly going to meet soon. When asked if he would like to see Trump and the CBC meet, West described the group as "neo-liberal."
"They’re too friendly to Wall Street. Too many of the campaigns come out of the Wall Street entities and therefore they are not free enough to really speak to the issue of poverty.

They haven’t made poverty a major priority, and that’s the legacy of Martin King and the others," he told PJM following a news conference with Hashim Nzinga, chairman of the New Black Panther Party, and Malik Zulu Shabazz, national president of Black Lawyers for Justice, at the National Press Club on Wednesday.
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  I'm willing to set up a tax upon Democrats to pay for reparations. According to Dinesh all slave holders were Democrats so that seems just to me.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-02-28 14:21  

#4  ...I don't think it's going to be direct (payments). It will probably be in the form of some kind of social support...

How's a brother sposed ta skim sum boodle fo himsef if da moneys be goin right to da peoples?
Posted by: DepotGuy    2017-02-28 14:05  

#3  359,528 Deaths. That was in a population less than 1/10 of today. To put that another way in today's perspective, that would be 3,590,280 deaths. Can you imagine anything America would intentionally sacrifice that many for today?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-02-28 14:05  

#2  I read somewhere that there were more union soldiers killed in the Civil War than there were slaves in the South.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2017-02-28 11:49  

#1  He also said there should be a "more serious conversation" in the U.S. about reparations for descendants of African-American slaves.

How many deaths were caused by the Civil War?

Union Enlistment 2,893,304 Confederate Enlistment 1,317,035 Battle Deaths 110,070 Battle Deaths 94,000 Disease Deaths 224,586 Disease Deaths 164,000 Other Causes 24,872 Other Causes No record given Total Deaths 359,528 Total Deaths 258,000 Percentage Deaths 12.4% Percentage Deaths 19.6%

If one makes an assumption that the Union soldiers were fighting on the side of emancipation; Although that may not be an accurate assumption since people go to war for many reasons, but let's assume it is true for now. It seems the debt was more than settled long ago. Leave it alone and put it to rest. Is that a serious enough conversation?
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-02-28 10:37  

00:00