You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Deployed US Navy Has A Preggies Problem, And It's Getting Worse
2017-03-02
[Daily Caller] A record 16 out of 100 Navy women are reassigned from ships to shore duty due to pregnancy, according to data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.

That number is up 2 percent from 2015, representing hundreds more who have to cut their deployments short, taxing both their unit’s manpower, military budgets and combat readiness. Further, such increases cast a shadow over the lofty gender integration goals set by former President Barack Obama.

Overall, women unexpectedly leave their stations on Navy ships as much as 50% more frequently to return to land duty, according to documents obtained from the Navy. The statistics were compiled by the Navy Personnel Command at the request of TheDCNF, covering the period from January 2015 to September 2016.

The evacuation of pregnant women is costly for the Navy. Jude Eden, a nationally known author about women in the military who served in 2004 as a Marine deployed to Iraq said a single transfer can cost the Navy up to $30,000 for each woman trained for a specific task, then evacuated from an active duty ship and sent to land. That figure translates into $115 million in expenses for 2016 alone.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  Somebody has to have the babies if there is to be a future, and you old Navy retirees aren't getting this job done. These sailors of the female persuasion are. So thank them for their good work.

That some morons have put women in combat positions, isn't the fault of these women.

Furthermore, these women are probably the best we can hope to be making our future.
Posted by: rammer   2017-03-02 22:18  

#6  When I was in the Navy (70-73) we didn't have this problem, mostly because the only women on ships were nurses on hospital ships.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2017-03-02 13:34  

#5  Nothing new: this has been going on for decades.
Posted by: Pappy   2017-03-02 13:21  

#4  this study cost how much? coulda just asked any goat locker and gotten this for free.
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2017-03-02 12:00  

#3  Need a 5-year pill for commitment from both sexes.
Oh, wait...our occupying boys in blue/green/gray couldn't breed a new generation of capitalists.

Next plan please.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-03-02 10:24  

#2  In the old days, when a military member self inflicted a wound to avoid danger or combat, the military justice handed out was rather harsh. That included the 'auxiliaries' being mustered out of the service. Today we have female privilege. They're rewarded. Meanwhile somewhere, some guy, is being tagged to go and fill the gap. He and his family are punished. DNA tag the kid, hunt down the sperm donor. If in uniform, prosecute.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-03-02 05:51  

#1  Unexpectedly.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-02 04:23  

00:00