You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
'Los Angeles Times' Puzzled at Lack of Trump Hatred
2017-03-12
[PJMEDIA]
And after millions of dollars were spent making Trump the issue on everything from land use decisions to fixing potholes, Angelenos stayed home. That could mean trouble for Democrats nationwide.... The question for Democrats: If these core groups in L.A. didn’t show up on Tuesday, will their counterparts elsewhere show up for the 2018 midterm?
Maybe that's also because Los Angeles is a one-state country, and California is a one-party state, whose voters are either very wealthy residents of coastal enclaves, and therefore protected from the consequences of their own votes, or the seething poor, many of them illegals, living east of Western Avenue. It's an unstable coalition at best, and one that will eventually collapse along with the blue-state model and its potholed roads, failing dams, trains to nowhere and lack of fresh water and arable land.
The middle class is in decline. And as it declines, so, it seems, does voting. That’s the story of Los Angeles, but perhaps it’s also the story of the Democratic Party.
If Democrats want voters to show up — and they’ve long argued that when more people show up, they win — they may have to prove to people who have less and less of an economic stake in our society that voting really matters. And to do that, they’re going to have to do more than remind everyone that Donald Trump is in the White House.
As the Democrats learned the hard way last November, however, showing up is not enough. As long as Democrats congregate in welfare states run by social-justice warriors, their larger effect on the country is nil. In effect, they've self-quarantined in a few states along the west coast, the upper midwest and the Bos-Wash corridor. The trick now is to keep them there.
Posted by:Fred

#15  Was anyone checking ID this go around? That could certainly depress the number of illegals and dead voting.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-03-12 21:38  

#14  O gie us, St. Andrew, the giftie:
Hispanics and hippies, spendthrifty,
Still helplessly lefty,
Unhealthily hefty,
A shiftless old 5150.
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2017-03-12 21:12  

#13  Except when the guy or gal in the WH is a Democrat.

And that JohnQC is why they lack even a shred of moral standing. As Abe said about not being able to fool all of the people all of the time ....
Posted by: Crumble Thusosing4082   2017-03-12 18:09  

#12  As leaders of the "Resistance," America's declining newspapers see their jobs as educating ignorant Americans about the dangers of That Man in the White House.

Except when the guy or gal in the WH is a Democrat.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-03-12 15:23  

#11  Factor in all those in LA who aren't, can't (or won't) be, or don't consider themselves, residents.
Posted by: Pappy   2017-03-12 13:38  

#10  But given that, according to the article which I've now read, turnout was under 12% this election, it has improved at least two percentage points since two years ago. This ought to be celebrated as an improvement, though I've not seen enough analysis to know if this is truly meaningful or merely normal variation around the average.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-03-12 13:37  

#9  I wondered if this low turnout is consistent with previous elections, so I looked up the November election. According to KPCC:

The final tally is in: voter turnout improved from 2012 across much of Southern California this year.

The glaring exception? Los Angeles County and its 5.3 million registered voters. Turnout in the county came in at 67.5 percent of registered voters — the lowest showing in a presidential election in two decades.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla certified the state's votes Friday afternoon, closing the books on the 2016 California election and providing a look at voter engagement across the state.

As a whole, California posted a 75.3 percent turnout, with 14.6 million Californians casting a ballot.

Southern California presented a mixed picture. Among five Southern California counties, only Los Angeles saw turnout fall from 2012 to 2016. It dipped from 68 percent four years ago to 67.5 percent.


Blacks and Hispanics stayed home for Hillary, after slightly bestirring themselves for Obama?

And the Huffington post has been bemoaning low and falling LA voter turnout for local elections annually for some years -- it looks like it was less than 10% in March, 2015.

When it's clear that the only reason for elections is to decide which set of politicians will enrich themselves and their friends at voter expense while the potholes, gangs, and schools remain awful, how many will bother?
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-03-12 13:30  

#8  Answer to LA Times:
"Because while we may dislike Trump, we absolutely detest You!
Posted by: ed in texas    2017-03-12 13:18  

#7  Seems the voters could tell local election issues from national election issues despite deceptions and millions of dollars.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-03-12 10:37  

#6  Tronc - the CHicago Trib conglomerate that owns the LAT rag bought our SD Union Trib. The spin in "news" and editorials is obvious. They can't seem to understand why their circulation is spiraling. The website started viewcount limits til they figured out people weren't gonna pay to read their shit
Posted by: Frank G   2017-03-12 10:10  

#5  "But we meant well" - 21st Century

right up there with

"I was only obeying orders" - 20th Century
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-03-12 08:48  

#4  Their bubble has been collapsing for some time now. Severe case of constipation or a turd that won't flush. This shall pass. Take away media propaganda and you will see the ugly naked truth. The progressive liberal at the end of life looks upon themselves in a mirror and sees the ugly truth of their counterfeit lives. The Dorian Gray experience.
Posted by: Dale   2017-03-12 08:15  

#3  ...Well, it's not like they know anyone who voted for him.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2017-03-12 07:55  

#2  The MSM has been lying to America since 1940's and the Clintons since 1970's; Trump never broke a promise, never raised my taxes, never.....
Posted by: Airandee    2017-03-12 07:41  

#1  No wonder the left coast press hasn't a clue. Progressives tend to live in a closed-minded self-reinforcing delusional bubble. It will be vicious when that bubble collapses on them.
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2017-03-12 05:45  

00:00