You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Report: Donald Trump to Lay Wreath at Andrew Jackson's Tomb Before Rallying Supporters in Tennessee
2017-03-15
[Breitbart] President Donald Trump will lay a wreath on former president Andrew Jackson’s grave on Wednesday before holding a rally for supporters in Nashville, Tennessee, according to CNN.

It’s another symbolic gesture towards Jackson’s legacy as a self-made man who represented the common people over the elites enraged by his rise. Trump hung a portrait of the seventh president in the Oval Office five days into his presidency.

"There hasn’t been anything like this since Andrew Jackson," Trump said at the time of his inauguration. The president admires Jackson, calling him "an amazing figure in American history--very unique so many ways." Trump especially respected Jackson’s "ability to never give up."

Trump’s advisors have compared him and his populist, nationalist movement to Jackson. White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon called Trump’s inauguration speech "Jacksonian," and said in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter that "like Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement."

"I’d say [Donald Trump] is the best public orator since William Jennings Bryan, and he has a better sense of the pulse of the people than any President at least since Andrew Jackson," White House Senior Adviser Stephen Miller told ABC News in February.

As Breitbart News’ Warner Todd Huston pointed out, the elites excoriated Jackson for letting the common man make themselves heard. Like Trump, Jackson rallied enormous numbers of Americans together while pursuing a populist agenda.

"No one who was at Washington at the time of General Jackson’s inauguration is likely to forget that period to the day of his death," journalist and author Arthur J. Stansbury recalled at the time, as explained in a biography of Francis Scott Key.

"To us, who had witnessed the quiet and orderly period of the Adams administration, it seemed as if half the nation had rushed at once into the capital. It was like the inundation of the northern barbarians into Rome, save that the tumultuous tide came in from a different point of the compass," he continued. "The West and the South seemed to have precipitated themselves upon the North and overwhelmed it. On that memorable occasion you might tell a ’Jackson man’ almost as far as you could see him. Their every motion seemed to cry out ’Victory!’"

The Obama administration had wanted to remove Jackson from the $20 bill.

Read Breitbart News’ explanation of Jackson’s legacy, and the Trump agenda’s connection to it, here.
The "Noble Savages"â„¢ are not going to like this.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#21  Heard the day after Trump's election: They took Andrew Jackson off the $20 bill and put him in the White House.
Posted by: The peanut gallery   2017-03-15 19:04  

#20  Native American males were a warrior people. They called them savages for good reason. Read what they did to captives and carcasus during the French and Indian war.

The Cherokee were more civilized, but their women married whites at the drop of a hat because they were still more civilized.

I met several Cherokee during my lifetime and unfortunately their culture still contains considerable strife amongst their own circles.
Posted by: Nero White 3083   2017-03-15 19:02  

#19  RJ, consistency is not a hobgoblin of the liberal mind (apologies to Joel Rosenberg). They'll integrate the fact that Andrew Jackson founded the democratic party in their worldview the same way they've integrated the fact that Abraham Lincoln, a republican, freed the slaves.
You want to hurt a liberal - use a stick.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-15 17:41  

#18  #15, right on. These are exciting times. Trump far outclasses these phonies. Far more intelligent than they realize. Watch him play these phonies and enjoy. This is history as dramatic as sending man to the moon. The future is now.
Posted by: Dale   2017-03-15 16:34  

#17  g(r)omgoru, I'm not a liberal anguishing over the ills. If the native Americans were not dispossessed by Anglos (and a lot of Scots and Germans) they would have been dispossessed by other Europeans, many of whom were a lot nastier.

So in other words the trail of tears doesn't bother me so much, but it does bother liberals and knowing it was one of the Democrat leaders is bound to cause some hair pulling and tears.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-03-15 16:30  

#16  War with Mexico was going to happen regardless due to the Bear Flag Revolt. The Battle of Olampali is unique in that it was the only battle of the Bear Flag Revolt that resulted in casualties - and simultaneously can also claim to be the 1st battle of the War with Mexico. The incidents leading up to the battle at Olompali would have continued in scope and desperation - it was just a matter of time. Following the battle, Ford's men then commandeered a boat - made way to the Spanish fort at San Francisco, disabled the cannon there and then returned to Sonoma.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2017-03-15 15:17  

#15  Getting more of a Teddy Roosevelt vibe from Trump, but a little Andrew Jackson thrown into the mix can't hurt.
Posted by: Iblis   2017-03-15 15:15  

#14  My point, rj, was - if your ancestors didn't dispossessed the Indians, where would you live?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-15 14:20  

#13  g(r)omgoru, if by the author you mean me, that answer would be San Diego California.

Rest assured our universities have been teaching of the horrors against the Native Americans (even when they had to invent a few horrors such as small pox blankets).

It'd be nice if Trump can stick a face to those horrors. A face that also happens to be the Founder of the Democrat party.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-03-15 14:08  

#12  and they (allegedly) gave us Senator Elizabeth Fauxcahontas Warren. For that they should've paid, and paid dearly
Posted by: Frank G   2017-03-15 11:58  

#11  The Cherokee cast their lot with the British and lost...who knows what would've happened had they sided with the Patriots. It aint all one sided here in Tennessee...the Cherokee were rezponsie for their share of war crimes.
Posted by: Tennessee   2017-03-15 11:54  

#10  Jackson is responsible for horrors against the Native Americans and war with Mexico.

Wonder where the author's living.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-15 11:39  

#9  Jackson is d responsible for horrors against the Native Americans and war with Mexico. But he is also the Father of the Democrat party.

Sounds like he's baiting a trap to me.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-03-15 10:45  

#8  The Obama administration had wanted to remove Jackson from the $20 bill.

It cheaply (political cost) gives a thrill to the Reparation Justice crowd of the Progressives. The Native American Tribes have an understandably visceral hatred of Jackson because of the Trail of Tears. Put a LibProg icon on the 20-bill and strike an Old White Guy equals a Win-Win.
Posted by: magpie   2017-03-15 10:21  

#7  Given the difference in their environments, I don't consider it a definitive distinction.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-15 08:44  

#6  g(r)om, another difference is that Trump doesn't own slaves like Jackson did.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2017-03-15 08:23  

#5  Obama wanted to remove A.J.'s picture from the $20 bill. How times have changed.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-03-15 08:17  

#4  The Don is like Andrew Jackson - except he fights duels on twitter.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-15 05:26  

#3  The Obama administration had wanted to remove Jackson from the $20 bill.


From Wikipedia - "was the founder of the Democratic Party"
Posted by: Thrinese Peacock4930   2017-03-15 04:57  

#2  MLK wasn't removed, that was fake news.
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309   2017-03-15 01:24  

#1  Trump hung a portrait of the seventh president in the Oval Office five days into his presidency.

Out with MLK, in with AJ. I like it.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-03-15 00:36  

00:00