You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Dems and New York Times kick 'non-electric' Ossoff under the bus
2017-04-20
[Breitbart] On Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," New York Times White House Correspondent Glenn Thrush reported, "my inbox this morning’s been flooded by Democrats who are sort of saying Ossoff was a terrible candidate."

Thrush said, "[W]hat is interesting is my inbox this morning’s been flooded by Democrats who are sort of saying Ossoff was a terrible candidate."

Thrush added, "[H]e was not electric. He was more static electric. But I think, in general, that is an issue. Look, the other thing is, look how deep the bench was down there. There were a lot of people who wanted that seat. I think the larger issue that we’re dealing with here right now, is the fact that the Democrats just don’t have a lot of candidates, not just in Georgia, but around the country in general. There’s not a lot of people to kind of catch this Trump wave."
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  I'm sorry, but that bus graphic had me chucking for like five or six minutes.

It's a keeper!
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance   2017-04-20 18:54  

#7  The Dems have no ideology nor principles.

They lust only for power. Anything they pretend to be concerned about is merely an illusion.
Posted by: Crusader   2017-04-20 16:14  

#6  "We" win, but "you" lose.
Posted by: regular joe   2017-04-20 15:05  

#5  Funny how they waited until after the election to criticize.
Posted by: gorb   2017-04-20 14:38  

#4  Well, there was the guy that walked the neighboring farms to get elected. Then there were the railstops. After that came the radio then TV pitches, then soundbites. I think this last one was talking heads, twitter and webvideo sensationalism.

I really don't know how the next will compress maximum info into limited attention spans but telegenic probably isn't the path.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-04-20 13:21  

#3  "Sorry, Jon. If you'd got 50%+ you'd have been the Second Comingâ„¢."
Posted by: Frank G   2017-04-20 09:13  

#2  The donks have always been about a candidate being telegenic, a B.S. artist and pushing their progressive agenda over having substance. Every now and then they slip up and pick a ringer.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-04-20 09:05  

#1  When your ideology principles cannot stand on their own then the messenger is all you have to bet on.
Posted by: Airandee    2017-04-20 06:30  

00:00