You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Land Audit Needed - 'You didn't build that'... successful farming operation.
2017-05-12
[De Klerk Foundation] In this article, it is (again) suggested that the country needs a proper and credible land audit before we carry on with a debate that would otherwise remain emotional and divisive. It is, secondly, highlighted that some research has shown that we may have progressed further with land reform than we are sometimes led to believe. And it is thirdly pointed out that the real "land hunger" is not necessarily for agricultural land to farm, but for urban and peri-urban land to build houses and make a home.

Land reform, especially of agricultural land, is nowadays almost a shibboleth for South African politics. The reasoning of the associated rhetoric usually has the following elements:

"Soil is prosperity, and if you first possess land, you can buy all the other good things with that wealth." And this usually refers to agricultural land.

"Historically, white people stole the land from black people and it has to be returned."

"23 years post-democracy, black people still only own 9.8% of the arable land in South Africa."

"There is a hunger for agricultural land among our people, like in Zimbabwe, and if we do not listen, we will follow the path of land occupation and confiscation."

Underscoring these arguments is that nothing - or very little - has been happening since 1994 and that radical action is needed to return (agricultural) land to black South Africans, such as to expropriate land without compensation. What is the reality? The table below shows the surface area of ​​South Africa, as well as the percentage of agricultural and arable land. It also shows that almost 50% of South Africa is considered desert (less than 200mm rain per year) or very dry (less than 400mm per year).
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Underscoringthese arguments is that nothing - or very little - has been happening since 1994 and that radical action is needed to return (agricultural) land to black South Africans, such as to expropriate land without compensation.

Go for it. It never works.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2017-05-12 19:17  

#3  "Historically, white people stole the land from black people and it has to be returned."

Because we stole it fair and square from some other black people who aren't around to say different.
Posted by: SteveS   2017-05-12 12:10  

#2  Blacks stole that land!
SA majority tribe were invaders from the north. They met a superior culture in the "whiteman" and lost!
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2017-05-12 11:35  

#1  "There is a hunger for agricultural land among our people, like in Zimbabwe, and if we do not listen, we will follow the path of land occupation and confiscation."

Lose your land to the squatters or the gov't. You decide.

De Klerk's threat reminds us [as he so often has] of the fundamental beliefs and tenants of the 'Deep State' and communism.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-05-12 08:36  

00:00