Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Sean Hannity Tweet: IMPORTANT! Mediamatters is trying to silence me, get me fired, pressure my advertising on radio & TV. Liberal Fascism. I need your help!! |
2017-05-24 |
This is about Seth Rich. If they give Hannity the thumb, it will be interesting to see what additional talent bids adieu and heads where. Fox may now be lost; Glenn Beck appears more prescient every day. |
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562 |
#20 BuzzFeed NEWS Reporter is on CRUSADE to kill Hannity’s sponsors and GETS ONE |
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562 2017-05-24 20:39 |
#19 WOW: Look Who Pressured Sean Hannity To Cease His Seth Rich Coverage! |
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562 2017-05-24 16:36 |
#18 I agree it mostly is, but a replacement for Fox News doesn't have to be a cable network, or just a cable network. I'm assuming a new network would see the decline in the media and try to think outside the box. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2017-05-24 16:09 |
#17 How about we admit that the old media is dead? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-05-24 15:14 |
#16 Perfect opportunity for someone to put together a FOX news replacement. Hopefully someone with less love for scrolling news on the bottom of the screen. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2017-05-24 15:11 |
#15 Sigh. Suppose we must. |
Posted by: Iblis 2017-05-24 14:35 |
#14 Seth Rich used Encrypted email from ProtonMail also confirmation he used the name Panda online |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2017-05-24 13:58 |
#13 John QC http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?D=2017-05-24&ID=488636#3750939 go to the post today about Donna Brazile and listen to the Sanders lawyer at approx. 21 minutes on the tape about election rigging. The death of the process server after serving the DNC adds another corpse in a chain of events that seem to dog the Clintons over the years as people are discouraged from careless talk about them and their behaviors...... |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2017-05-24 13:49 |
#12 @#10: The coppers have/had Mr. Rich's "computer." This could be of "issue." |
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562 2017-05-24 13:43 |
#11 I don't believe anything was 'lifted' from Mr. Rich by the perp(s) after he was shot, JohnQC. His money, watch, phone, etc. were still on his person (according to his father), so robbery might not have been the motive. |
Posted by: Mullah Richard 2017-05-24 12:08 |
#10 The story that generated this brouhaha and pushback by the left is the Seth Rich murder coverage. There is no smoking gun. No one has been caught. It could just be a robbery. However, there is plenty of motive on the part of those connected to the DNC. There is circumstantial evidence and there is plenty of weirdness about the entire case. I think there should be a push to investigate it further by the DOJ and either put this to bed or take it as far as it will go. Does anyone know any political figures who have the large number of strange deaths and murders around them as the Clintons? |
Posted by: JohnQC 2017-05-24 11:45 |
#9 One doesn't have to be a fan of O'Reilly or Hannity to be concerned that there could be ZERO channels that even pretend to lean towards the conservative side of the isle. I'm in no hurry for that to come about. |
Posted by: Crusader 2017-05-24 11:38 |
#8 No intention to defame supermarket weeklies with that comparison. True or false the weeklies never seem to be actively suppressing 'news'. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2017-05-24 11:13 |
#7 CNN = Supermarket weekly of cable news. |
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance 2017-05-24 10:19 |
#6 I really don't care where Whinnity goes. I meant consumers of news should forget about Murdoch family owned products. Faux News wants some of the MSNBC anti-Trump ratings goodness. Watch them go get it. Wall Street Journal is Buzzfeed without cat videos and bikini girl pictures. Is there a picture of Tory Burch on the cover today? I have no idea. I cancelled my subscription last year after a 30+ year run. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2017-05-24 08:59 |
#5 Faux News is gone. Forget about it. Most of us are no strangers to the tools used to destroy Fox. More commonly employed in the workplace, there really is no defense. Once they surface and you are targeted, you might as well begin looking elsewhere for employment. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-05-24 08:48 |
#4 Hannity is a perpetual whiner. He's an awful model for conservatives to follow, "Ooooh, look what those mean, dishonest liberals are up to now! Oooooh, my tummy hurts!" He's Glenn Beck with a better developed level of drool control. Faux News is gone. Forget about it. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2017-05-24 08:34 |
#3 Like the telegraph went downhill after the barclay brothers bought it. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2017-05-24 06:52 |
#2 ...Also keep in mind that the Murdoch boys (James, who now writes the checks and Lachlan, who doesn't really seem to care all that much as long as the goodies keep coming) both consider themselves 'responsible corporate guardians', i.e.; SJWs with a LOT of money. Sir Rupert was the one who, with Roger Ailes, built Fox into a conservative news powerhouse. But Roger's gone and Sir Rupert is 86 and retired. The boys have no interest at all in keeping Fox even vaguely right-ish, and it's starting to look like that after O'Reilly got his, the word went out that Hannity should probably dust off his resume. He was the last 'name' they had left, and he won't be there long. Within a year or so, look for Fox to become a televised version of the Guardian. Mike |
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2017-05-24 05:42 |
#1 This is the Left's weapon after the election. No-platform dissidents by attacking their advertisers. It's unfortunately working well and silencing voice after voice. |
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309 2017-05-24 03:09 |