You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Comey will stop short of saying Trump obstructed justice in Flynn probe, source says
2017-06-06
[ABC] There will be much in former FBI Director James Comey’s upcoming congressional testimony that will make the White House uncomfortable, but he will stop short of saying the president interfered with the agency's probe into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, a source familiar with Comey's thinking told ABC News.

Although Comey has told associates he will not accuse the President of obstructing justice, he will dispute the president’s contention that Comey told him three times he is not under investigation.

The president allegedly said he hoped Comey would drop the Flynn investigation, a request that concerned Comey enough that he documented the conversation in a memo shortly after speaking with the president. In the memo, according to sources close to Comey who reviewed it, Trump said: "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go," during a February meeting.

The request made Comey uncomfortable, but the source tells ABC News that Comey has told associates he will not accuse the President of obstructing justice.

"He is not going to Congress to make accusations about the President’s intent, instead he’s there to share his concerns," the source said, and tell the committee "what made him uneasy" and why he felt a need to write the memo documenting the conversation.

Some legal experts told ABC News that Trump's requests as detailed in the memo, which ABC News has not seen, could meet the legal definition of obstruction.
Or not. Since ABC News staff have not seen the alleged memo, which may or may not exist, there is a maximum of 25% probability that it does indeed meet that definition.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  He won't though, newc. He's smart enough to answer the given questions 'appropriately' and the questioners probably won't throw too many curve balls or sliders.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2017-06-06 22:14  

#6  The fun it would be if he suborns purgery
Posted by: newc   2017-06-06 20:44  

#5  So Comey only told Trump he wasn't the subject of investigation twice and the other time Trump misunderstood?
Posted by: Glenmore on the road (again)   2017-06-06 19:13  

#4  Comey seems to have a hard time determining what is a crime and what is not. Maybe best to leave the prosecutor's duties to the prosecutors.

As far as Comey is concerned, if a Clinton is involved, it is NOT a crime. You can take that to the bank.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-06-06 18:59  

#3  If he does he will be confessing to a felony. He knows the law. He will tap all around it, but not say it.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2017-06-06 18:57  

#2  Comey seems to have a hard time determining what is a crime and what is not. Maybe best to leave the prosecutor's duties to the prosecutors.
Posted by: Chesney Wittlesbach8478   2017-06-06 18:14  

#1  Expectation management after weeks of feverish handwringing. MSM and dems hardest hit...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2017-06-06 16:15  

00:00