You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
If We Really Want to Get to the Bottom of the Russia Matter, Trump Isn't the Only Story
2017-07-16
[Townhall] A palate cleanser with some conservative appeal from an unlikely source in Vox. Relocating federal agencies to middle America has some support, unsurprisingly, among Democrats from middle America but it’s also gotten a thumbs up from at least one big-name Republican. In January, House Oversight Committee chair Jason Chaffetz called for draining the swamp by dispersing key parts of it around the country:
"I do believe conceptually in my heart that if you want a government that is reflective of the people, they need to be closer to the people," he said during the hearing. "What would it look like if the Department of Agriculture was maybe based in Oklahoma?" he said. "What if we had a Department of the Interior that was based in Utah or Colorado? What if the Department of Transportation was based in Los Angeles, for instance?"...

While it makes sense for security agencies, including the Pentagon and the departments of Justice and Homeland Security, to remain in the District, rank-and-file bureaucrats do not need to live in the nation’s capitol, Chaffetz said.

If you worry that the feds are too disconnected from "real America," there’s a solution: Pack ’em up and move ’em to real America. Key agencies that need regular contact with the president and Congress would stay put, everyone else could be scattered to the winds. We live in a glorious age of ubiquitous webcams and smartphones. Virtual meetings shouldn’t be hard to arrange among far-flung bureaucrats. Lots of benefits to this idea -- a less myopic federal government, a shot in the arm economically for middle-American cities that are struggling, and a body blow to the D.C. region that’s grown scandalously rich off of its proximity to Uncle Sam.

Posted by:Besoeker

#3  Poor New Mexico, always the dumping spot for NIMBY projects. Want to test your first nuke, let's go to NM. Want to store your nuclear waste, just drop it off in NM. Want air space to practice supersonic training, just make time in NM. If it wasn't for all the stuff other people don't want, we'd always be at the bottom of states in income. Although, moving the big boys here will raise the price of graft. As a poor state, politicians have been rather amazingly cheap.

Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-07-16 10:28  

#2  You definitely should move some to New Mexico.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-07-16 04:10  

#1  Clinton 'story' to be investigated immediately following OJ finding 'real killers.'
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-07-16 01:44  

00:00