You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
The Historic Implications Of Erik Prince's Plan For Afghanistan
2017-08-03
[Feral Jundi] So folks, I have been waiting a bit to post on this because so much has been written about it and I wanted to see where it goes. Basically Erik Prince came up with a plan for Afghanistan that would have historic implications for this industry and country if implemented.

Already, contractors are a part of the history of this war, with great sacrifice and from many partner nations over the last 16 years. But this....this is an entirely different level.

At this point in time, we have a standing US President that is actually considering a plan conceived by a contractor. Actually two, because Stephen A. Feinberg of Cerberus Group and owner of Dyncorp came up with a plan as well. But I will focus on the Prince plan because of how much traction it is getting. I say traction, because the media and the naysayers of this industry have been writing this off as insignificant or risible.
Of course they do, because they did not propose it.
But I say not so fast....because from what I have heard on the grapevine, this is getting much more serious consideration than what is reported.

About the plan. It is basically modeled after what the US did in post war Japan, using a viceroy to command over the effort and an army of contractors. US Special Operations would still have a presence in the country to counter the Taliban and the various jihadists. It is a long term, cost saving answer to providing presence in that country. A solution that would dramatically lessen the contractor footprint in Afghanistan according to Prince, and send most of the troops home (minus the special operations folks).

Please read the plan below. I would also suggest listening to Erik Prince talk about the plan in his media blitz, ever since November of last year. This too is historically significant. Since Prince donated to the Trump campaign, as did his sister Betsy DeVos (who is now Secretary of Education), Erik has had the ear of the President of the United States. He also speaks the language of business, which is familiar to Trump.

This interaction between an Administration and a private contractor reminds me of Claire Lee Chennault and his dealings with the Roosevelt administration for the formation of the Flying Tigers in China. The Flying Tigers were the only game in town after Pearl Harbor, and they were the rock star private air force that was sticking it to the Japanese in China. Claire made Time magazine’s man of the year back then, and several movies were made about what he did with his motley crew.
Posted by:Besoeker

#16  Dynacorp was allegedly involved in the sexual exploitation of children in Bosnia in the 90's during peacekeeping operations. It was the subject of the 2010 film The Whistleblower - though nobody was ever convicted of a crime.
Posted by: Secret Master   2017-08-03 17:39  

#15  Reaching for MacArthur as a model is sure to set the cat among the left's pigeons. They hate the guy more than anyone else they know.

And who does Prince have in mind as the MacArthur for Afghanistan? Himself? MacArthur was a very great man, very unique. Prince must have someone in mind.
Posted by: TopRev   2017-08-03 16:05  

#14  Sounds like a good idea to me. One hitch I see up front:

MacArthur was made SCAP after Japan surrendered. One might think a MacArthur in Afghanistan would have to follow after an unconditional surrender there by ... whom? ... perhaps ... ?

I don't know. Maybe the parallel is not applicable.
Posted by: TopRev   2017-08-03 16:02  

#13  Have bad, bad paper on DynaCorp from Africa. The Congos, etc.

I have less faith in them, but they could augment.
Posted by: newc   2017-08-03 13:04  

#12  DynaCorp? DynaCorp has been mentioned in WikiLeaks. Something about DynaCorp and dancing boys in Afghanistan. DynaCorp. No wonder, they decided to look at the Prince plan instead of DynaCorp plan, a Hillary leftover.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-08-03 10:26  

#11  Until you take out Pakistan, you'll never remove a base of operation for the OPFOR.

The drug trade becomes off limits when you are pushing upward in a waterfall. You cannot tell a farmer to stop that. You are not here to police their economics as far as non-humans are concerned.

Given the American capacity to genetically engineer, a opium 'blast' should have already been developed and prepared for dispersal. It's not like its a food supply.

Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-08-03 09:36  

#10  The entire ME isn't worth a tin pale of warm camel pi**. Get out, stay out, and let them fight it out among themselves. Put all their evil, death cult who come near us to the sword or we too will perish.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-08-03 04:40  

#9  The drug trade becomes off limits when you are pushing upward in a waterfall. You cannot tell a farmer to stop that. You are not here to police their economics as far as non-humans are concerned.


Served better by knowing where those drugs are going (Iran, Russia...) than to cut off the farmers crop.

This is a banking and Intelligence game. And the DOD is woefully prepared to handle it with their MET - as far retarded it is for this region.

If you follow the monies, you have less overhead in munitions.

I have all their balance sheets. Figure that out for real and then act like you are going after IRGC.

House of Saud's influence may help or change the dynamic of this but as far as today - anything is up for grabs.

We shall see.
Posted by: newc   2017-08-03 03:14  

#8  Anyone have better ideas how to tame the scorpion?

Bomb the opium fields with incendiaries.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-08-03 03:01  

#7  I have been watching this and him for - forever.

There are others that watch too who are on the ground.

Here is the markup from june where relook at Afghanistan all came from. Here is Baba Tim with an outline of the situation:
http://freerangeinternational.com/blog/?p=6954

Here is Erik Prince's article in WSJ https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-macarthur-model-for-afghanistan-1496269058?mod=e2tw

An finally, presenting a probabable Viceroy
http://freerangeinternational.com/blog/?p=7071

Right now, with me, it is a GO.

Anyone have better ideas how to tame the scorpion?
Posted by: newc   2017-08-03 02:11  

#6  we might as well write the whole thing off as a lost cause

might ---> should
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-08-03 01:16  

#5  Good question G(r)omgoru, If the CIA gets involved, we might as well write the whole thing off as a lost cause. What Skidmark said is more likely to happen then.
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance   2017-08-03 01:14  

#4  Seeking, who do you think is going to veto condottieres (contractor in Italian) for USG?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-08-03 01:08  

#3  And why shouldn't all of that graft money come back home? Prob introduce good crop management practices to increase the opium yield as well.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-08-03 01:07  

#2  No, keep the CIA out of this if the plan is to have any chance of success!

CIA has a horrible record when it comes to managing large scale operations.
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance   2017-08-03 00:57  

#1  Turning Afghanistan into CIA's private kingdom?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-08-03 00:40  

00:00