| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Conservatism Is Not A Suicide Pact |
| 2017-08-28 |
| h/t Instapundit [Townhall] The whiny wailing and rending of garments (mostly bow ties) by the True Cons over President Trump pardoning Sheriff Joe Arpaio brings to mind another president’s choice when a loyal supporter was the victim of a liberal witch hunt. President Bush was an honorable man, but the way he allowed Scooter Libby and the Libby family to be ruined and impoverished over what everyone knew was a skeevy liberal political vendetta before issuing a partial commutation is to W’s lasting shame. His excuse: the Rule of Law or something. But, as anyone willing to see knows, today the Rule of Law is a unicorn and it has been for a long time. I like the Rule of Law, and I’ve been warning for years about what happens when it goes away. Yet we are where we are, whether we like it or not. We’re in a land where the law is only intermittently and selectively applicable. Allowing allies to suffer in an effort to pretend that all is well is not going to bring the Rule of Law back. Nostalgia for the Rule of Law no excuse for tolerating an injustice to an ally. Hell, undoing injustices is what the pardon power is for. What will bring the Rule of Law back? How do we get to the Conserva-Eden we are expected to act like we already reside it? Perhaps another statement of principle? Maybe another post on some unread conservajournal? I know ‐ how about more complaining about how frustrated conservatives are uncouth and should just sit there and take whatever fascist garbage the left dishes out? ...My plan is to cause the left so much pain by applying their new rules to them that they give up trying to grind their Birkenstocks into our faces forever. Yes, as a practical matter that means allying with President Trump, guy I formerly criticized in detail and without restraint, and who was my 16th of 17 choices in the primary (Jeb! was last because he’s an insufferable wuss and I won’t suffer him). See, I reject the notion we are ever somehow morally obligated by conservative principles to lose to liberals. If I have to swallow something awful, I’ll take half a loaf any day over an entire loaf of liberal dung like Felonia von Pantsuit. I think the new rules are terrible, and they are antithetical to everything I’ve worked for since before many of my Fredocon critics were a tinge of regret growing in their mommies’ bellies the morning after. But I refuse to sit back and allow libs to be victorious because I won’t dirty my hands fighting fire with fire. If that makes me not conservative enough for some, I can live with that. I can’t live with leftist tyranny. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #6 So they may chose which court orders to follow and which ones not? Be careful what you wish for. Presidents change. |
| Posted by: European Conservative 2017-08-28 22:31 |
| #5 Law enforcement officers sworn duty is to enforce laws derived from the Constitution. Not to follow court orders that favor anti-constitutionalists who want as many globalist, foreign nationals canceling US Citizen votes to put pro-US Citizen officers like him out of national, state, and local office. |
| Posted by: Hupeting Sforza8196 2017-08-28 22:12 |
| #4 racial (although facial isn't entirely wrong) |
| Posted by: European Conservative 2017-08-28 20:53 |
| #3 Arpaio was in law enforcement. I understand it may be a matter of debate whether he did facial profiling or not. But the fact is: He ignored court orders and publicly bragged about not following court orders. And that's not what a law enforcement officer does. |
| Posted by: European Conservative 2017-08-28 20:52 |
| #2 "If everyone is thinking alike, then someone isn't thinking" Gen George S. Patton |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2017-08-28 14:35 |
| #1 Belgarath: I prefer simpler terms. Garion: "Good vs. Evil"? Belgarath: "Us against Them". |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-08-28 09:22 |