You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Time to examine military option in Korea
2017-09-04
by Conrad Black

It has become a truism in the continuing North Korean crisis to say that there is no good military option, but in fact there is.

The fact is that if a carefully planned swarm attack of low-flying cruise missiles was launched against the North Korean artillery massed across the frontier, just 35 miles from the immense South Korean capital city, Seoul, as well as at all North Korean missile launchers, and research and missile storage facilities, it would denuclearize the North and eliminate its power of intimidation against the South.

As the attacks occurred, the U.S. could warn North Korea, directly and via China, that if any attack were launched against any American or allied sites, the North Korean regime would be obliterated, but that if there were no military response, the United States and its allies would not seek regime change in the North or the reunification of Korea.

It is inconceivable that, in these circumstances, the Chinese would not sternly counsel Pyongyang to stand down. China does not want a nuclear North Korea, or a reunited Korea, which would shortly become a second Japan in industrial and strategic terms, immediately adjacent to it.

All the tired palaver about negotiating patiently with China about constraining North Korea is practically beside the point. It won't unmake North Korea as a nuclear military power. And it won't deter Iran from becoming one, now at the end of the 10-year life of the shabby agreement President Obama sponsored with that terrorism-supporting country.

Iran and North Korea have exposed the fraudulence of the non-proliferation regime, in which the existing nuclear powers made the spurious promise to pursue joint self-disarmament. The best that can be salvaged is a nuclear club from which psychopathically governed countries such as North Korea and Iran are excluded.

President Trump said on Tuesday that "All options are on the table." There is only one that will work, and it should be very seriously considered.
Posted by:ryuge

#14  SLS is looking for a reason to exist.. It could take a Nerva engine to an asteroid. Just suggesting...
Posted by: 3dc   2017-09-04 20:38  

#13  I note that a 3km diameter asteroid at a 45 degree inclination would not effect neighbor's too much.
Posted by: 3dc   2017-09-04 20:37  

#12  Alternatively choose an asteroid and see what it's effect would be here

Also a list of them here: List of object in the Solar System by size
Posted by: 3dc   2017-09-04 20:35  

#11  Both China and Nork have their regime stability as their primary objective. For this reason China won't get involved militarily. Any kind of blockade would send their economy into chaos.
Posted by: phil_b   2017-09-04 20:03  

#10   Need watching as possible alternate NKor launch sites include Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. Commie dictators be us.
Posted by: 3dc   2017-09-04 15:37  

#9  I have read that some / many of the N Korean artillery emplacements were originally installed underground, and will not be exposed to possible air attack until a few minutes before they might be used.

Built long before laser designators were cheap and popular. Then there is the problem when the firing port is covered by debris loosened from above.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-09-04 15:25  

#8  Put a huge bounty on his head. Call all his top peeps personally with the offer. Air drop Glocks to everyone. Pop corn. Enjoy.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2017-09-04 14:47  

#7  Til the Japanese and SKor's start acquiring/building nukes
Posted by: Frank G   2017-09-04 12:44  

#6  China does not want a nuclear North Korea

North Korea is always useful to China.
Posted by: Pappy   2017-09-04 12:13  

#5  I have read that some / many of the N Korean artillery emplacements were originally installed underground, and will not be exposed to possible air attack until a few minutes before they might be used. To deal with that, the US could drop autonomous bulldozes from cruise missiles to dig those out /sarc
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2017-09-04 11:31  

#4  I like the idea of carpet bombing better than cruise missiles. Maybe use the cruise missiles for an initial strike on command and control but followed immediately with massive, heavy bombing.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-09-04 11:25  

#3  the Chinese meant EXACTLY what they said - as long as we don't shoot first, they'll stay out of it

Unlike 1950, China is a rich country now, and USA is their main market.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-09-04 06:56  

#2  And the Chinese meant EXACTLY what they said - as long as we don't shoot first, they'll stay out of it. That means something like this brings the PRC in on Kimmie's side.

It's not like we haven't seen it happen previously.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-09-04 06:19  

#1  "The fact is that if a carefully planned swarm attack of low-flying cruise missiles was launched against the North Korean artillery massed across the frontier, just 35 miles from the immense South Korean capital city, Seoul, as well as at all North Korean missile launchers, and research and missile storage facilities, it would denuclearize the North and eliminate its power of intimidation against the South."

I enjoy Mr. Black's opinions, but it has to be pointed out that there aren't enough cruise missiles in the entire US inventory to do this, never mind the fact that even if there were, the sight of all those launch platforms lining up would probably get someone's attention.

And the Chinese meant EXACTLY what they said - as long as we don't shoot first, they'll stay out of it. That means something like this brings the PRC in on Kimmie's side.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2017-09-04 06:14  

00:00