| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government |
| President Trump Lands His Biggest Judicial Appointment Since Gorsuch |
| 2017-09-04 |
| [Daily Caller] Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced his retirement Friday afternoon, affording President Donald Trump the opportunity to replace a legal titan on the Chicago-based federal appeals court. Posner is one of the most consequential legal figures of recent times, exerting significant influence on the practice and study of law from his perches on the Seventh Circuit and the University of Chicago Law School faculty. Something of an intellectual gadfly, he has written 50 books, 500 academic articles, and several thousand legal opinions on a wide range of subjects, a prodigious output surpassing even Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, Posner’s hero and perhaps the most lettered Supreme Court justice of his time. And Posner is almost certainly the most read jurist of recent decades: The Journal of Legal Studies says he was the most cited legal scholar of the 20th century. Posner subscribes to a method of judging called "pragmatism," which seeks to balance the equities of each case and conform judicial rulings to the social, political, and economic arrangements of the times. He touted his commitment to pragmatism in announcing his retirement. "I am proud to have promoted a pragmatic approach to judging during my time on the Court, and to have had the opportunity to apply my view that judicial opinions should be easy to understand and that judges should focus on the right and wrong in every case," he said in a statement announcing his retirement. His vaunted pragmatism is often difficult to define, oscillating between libertarian law and economic theories and pure utilitarianism. What’s more, there are few in the federal judiciary as comfortable discarding precedent as Posner. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #7 Just imagine if the judge goes back into private practice. Client: "So, your judgeness, under this here contract can I stop shipping to my deadbeat customer?" Posner: "That depends on the social, political and economic arrangements of the times. Your contract has no fixity. My fee will be $50,000 for that advice." Client: "Sorry, judge, but our fee agreement has no fixity, and them there social whatever changed just about five minutes ago. You owe me $50,000." |
| Posted by: Matt 2017-09-04 13:35 |
| #6 In short - he wasn't a 'Judge'. He was a 'Lord'. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2017-09-04 11:21 |
| #5 “I don’t know what ‘existing law’ means except views currently held by many judges, lawyers, and politicians,” he wrote for Slate in August. “Those views are likely to be fluid, changeable — in accordance with new social needs, attitudes, and authority. Law means one thing to conservatives, another to liberals. It has no fixity.” One could argue that if the law is considered fluid, then you have no legal benchmarks or in a couple of words "no law." |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2017-09-04 10:25 |
| #4 '...conform judicial rulings to the social, political, and economic arrangements of the times.' Any fad will due just as long as it doesn't involve actual Law of course. |
| Posted by: Cesare 2017-09-04 09:30 |
| #3 ...There's also a school of thought that suspects Judge Posner wanted really bad to be one of the Supremes, and knows now he ain't gonna get it. Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2017-09-04 08:58 |
| #2 Senators exercise a veto over appointments within their states. One of those 'ancient' practices of the old boy club. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2017-09-04 08:08 |
| #1 The left has worked diligently through judicial fiat for literally decades to re-shape the country into the classic Soviet model. This is an absolute OUTRAGE ! |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2017-09-04 07:27 |