You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
ACLU to Trump: Only Congress can authorize North Korea military action
2017-09-06
[THEHILL] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) warned President Trump on Tuesday that only Congress can authorize a military strike on North Korea, as tensions with Pyongyang continue to escalate.
You knew something like this was coming.
"The American Civil Liberties Union strongly urges you to uphold the Constitution, and the fundamental principle of separation of powers, by recognizing the sole authority of Congress to declare war ‐ and to refrain from the use of force against North Korea in the absence of explicit congressional authorization for the use of force," the group wrote in a letter to Trump on Tuesday.

"This drumbeat of threats over the past several weeks has raised concerns across the country about whether you will abide by the check on the president’s power that is fundamental to the Constitution’s separation of powers on war authority."

The letter cites a number of comments Trump has made over the past month about North Korea after the country test-fired intercontinental ballistic missiles and carried out its sixth nuclear test.

Posted by:Fred

#8  Darth, technically we are in an armistice. Per Wiki: It was signed by U.S. Army Lieutenant General William Harrison, Jr. representing the United Nations Command (UNC), North Korean General Nam Il representing the Korean People's Army (KPA), and the Chinese People’s Volunteer Army. It doesn't say why S Korea did not sign it.
Seems we were the first to abrogate the treaty by putting nukes in S.Korea in the 60's.
Posted by: texhooey   2017-09-06 18:10  

#7  Two points. 1. If we had to wait for Congress to do anything it might happen sometime towards the end of Trumps second term or never. 2. If there were a launch against the U.S., there would not be time to obtain a declaration of war against the Nork's. Are response would be required ASAP.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-09-06 15:50  

#6  Technically, you fucknuts, we are already at war. Just in a very long truce and we can fire at any time.
Posted by: DarthVader   2017-09-06 10:02  

#5  And homophobes.
Posted by: gorb   2017-09-06 09:59  

#4  Trump's going to have a kinetic military action, it's not a war.

ACLU are obviously racists if they complain...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2017-09-06 07:57  

#3  Just awoke from an 8 year sleep?

Why don't you take that up with Congress run by the Uniparty which has funded wars for that same period. Which is why if you had any concept of the Constitution and it founders, they focused on keeping the standing army and navy small and backed off of alliances so that the Executive couldn't get involved in these things. That was all thrown out in 1948. You're late to the party. See - Thomas Jefferson vs Barbary Pirates, if you like precedent.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-09-06 07:51  

#2  Tell it to the Libyans.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-09-06 01:14  

#1  Can we move the ACLU headquarters to Guam?
Posted by: gorb   2017-09-06 01:05  

00:00