You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Home secy told to decide JuD leaders representation by 11th
2017-09-09
[DAWN] The Lahore High Court on Thursday directed Punjab
1.) Little Orphan Annie's bodyguard
2.) A province of Pakistain ruled by one of the Sharif brothers
3.) A province of India. It is majority (60 percent) Sikh and Hindoo (37 percent), which means it has relatively few Moslem riots....

home secretary to decide by Sept 11 a representation of Jamatud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed
...founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba and its false-mustache offshoot Jamaat-ud-Dawa. The United Nations declared the JuD a terrorist organization in 2008 and Hafiz Saeed a terrorist as its leader. Hafiz, JuD and LeT are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Pak intel apparatus, so that amounted to squat...
and four other leaders against their detention.

Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi passed the order on a writ petition of JuD leaders challenging their detention orders issued on July 28, 2017, under sub-section 1 of Section 3 of the Maintenance of Public Order, 1960, for a period of next 60 days.

Advocate AK Dogar argued there was no evidence with the government that the petitioners were planning to spread chaos in the country or that they had planned violent demonstrations.

He said the government in the impugned detention orders had only shown apprehension with regard to petitioners. However,
some men learn by reading. A few learn by observation. The rest have to pee on the electric fence for themselves...
he said, under the law no presumption and assumption could give rise to any apprehension unless it was supported by some piece of evidence.

The counsel argued an order of preventive detention had to satisfy the requirements laid down by the Supreme Court in its many judgments but in the instant case blatant violation of laws had been committed by the government.

Posted by:Fred

00:00