You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Clapper: Intelligence community ‘cast doubt on the legitimacy' of Trump's victory
2017-09-24
[The Hill] The former director of National Intelligence said that the intelligence community's conclusion that Russians sought to influence the 2016 election "cast doubt on the legitimacy" of President Trump's victory.

"Our intelligence community assessment did, I think, serve to cast doubt on the legitimacy of his victory in the election," James Clapper said in a CNN interview on Friday night.

Clapper oversaw the January report that concluded, in a consensus between the CIA, NSA and FBI, that Russia carried out a deliberate and multifaceted attempt to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The report found convincing evidence that Russia had specifically worked to aid Donald Trump in winning the presidency.

While the report did not find evidence that Russians had actually influenced the results of the election, Clapper said that he thinks that implication concerns Trump more than anything else.

"And I think that above all else is what concerned him, and I think that transcends, unfortunately, the real concern here, which is Russian interference in the political process, which by the way is going to continue," Clapper continued.
Somehow this dasdardly 'Russian election involvement' was overlooked in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. Luckily for us, our intelligence community has unearthed these evil plots.
Trump has repeatedly dismissed reports of the Russian attempts to influence the election, referring to the investigations into Russian meddling on Friday as a "hoax," and accusing the media of biased coverage.
My emphasis provided para 5.
Posted by:Besoeker

#13  
Posted by: 746   2017-09-24 20:18  

#12  #7 Bush's biggest mistake after 9/11 was that he didn't take a machete to the intelligence agencies who all dropped the ball

And it's looking like Trump is making the same mistake.

Posted by: charger   2017-09-24 19:05  

#11  Just remember some tags - it does sounds better, sonorous.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-09-24 16:05  

#10  #7 He hurts the good who spares the bad (Publilius Syrus)

A student of Latin, g(r)om?
Posted by: Bobby   2017-09-24 16:04  

#9  The CIA were drug lords of sort in the Vietnam war. Did they ever reform?
Posted by: 3dc   2017-09-24 14:42  

#8  Traitors
Posted by: newc   2017-09-24 14:31  

#7  Bush's biggest mistake after 9/11 was that he didn't take a machete to the intelligence agencies who all dropped the ball

Bonis nocet quisquis pepercerit malis
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-09-24 11:11  

#6  Bush's biggest mistake after 9/11 was that he didn't take a machete to the intelligence agencies who all dropped the ball, because he knew they were all good guys. It came back to bite him, and has created a situation where you can't take what they say at face value, because you don't know the motivation.
Posted by: ed in texas   2017-09-24 09:44  

#5  I'm casting doubt on the legitimacy of the alphabet agencies...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2017-09-24 09:01  

#4  The "Intelligence Community " has its own Proctoscope? Isn't Science wonderful?

It's really dark in there. Somebody bring a flashlight.
Posted by: Hupilet Sposh8835   2017-09-24 06:40  

#3  Clapper is a perjurer and simply an outright POS. Lock him up, too!
Posted by: Clem   2017-09-24 06:28  

#2  A butterfly flapping its wings in Amazonian delta had some influence on your elections - unless Russians can be shown to hack your voting machines, or to bus in loads of fake voters (and you probably don't want to go there) - what the hell does it matter?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-09-24 04:26  

#1  While the report did not find evidence that Russians had actually influenced the results of the election

So there's no there.... there.

But Clapper is right about one thing. "Casting Doubt" certainly appears to have been (and remain) an Intelligence Community goal.

Please, let us be honest. Forget everything else, her history, husband, and campaign. Having observed the post-election Hillary Clinton, is there really anyone who believes she would have been the better choice ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-09-24 03:21  

00:00