You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
The Lamps are Going Out in Asia
2017-09-27
[38 North] US President Donald Trump’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly on September 19 may well come to be viewed as "historic," but not in a good way. This article will leave for others the impact of Donald Trump’s and Kim Jong Un’s reality TV show rhetoric. But the substance of Trump’s speech‐including threats to both North Korea and the Iran deal‐may have closed any remaining doors to a diplomatic resolution to this crisis surrounding North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs. Moreover, Trump’s speech and the North Korean reaction seem to have set us on a path that could very well end in a major war in Asia. The escalating threats and the closing off of diplomatic options by both sides makes it now more likely than ever that President Trump will have to make good on his threat to "utterly destroy" a nation of 25 million people. The strategic consequences of carrying out this threat, even if successful, will be felt for the remainder of this century, largely to the detriment of the United States and the Western World.

Echoes of the Past

Major wars are not created with a single action. They flow from a series of decisions that drive participants towards a sense that no other action but war can extricate them from their predicament. For example, many historians now credit Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany’s July 2, 1914 telegram to the Austrian government, which gave his ally a so-called blank check to do whatever it wished in the crisis with Serbia, as the fatal step that set the machinery inexorably in motion for the catastrophe of World War I. Trump shares one common and dangerous trait with the Kaiser: both were amateur militarists given to public bluster and adopting an ultra-nationalist bully-boy style of diplomacy, in part to cover up vast weaknesses in their own characters and their lack of understanding of their countries’ true strengths. But neither of these individuals intended to unleash catastrophe. Certainly, the Kaiser would never have sent his blank check if he had known it would result in the fall of his own dynasty, the disappearance of centuries-old empires, the death of millions, and the emergence of Nazism in his country. No doubt, Trump sees himself as a heroic figure standing up to a mad tyrant using rhetoric, economic pressure and, if necessary, military force to break him. He does not see because he does not understand the vast risks he is running for his own citizens, or millions of residents of East Asia.

Why the Alarm?

What could prompt the author to make such apocalyptic historical parallels from what, in the context of the never-ending stream of ill-considered words from this President, was a fairly average speech? First, it was uttered in an unstable, nuclear-armed strategic environment. Second, it confirmed in front of the entire global community that should conflict come, it would be total in nature with the survival of both the North Korean regime and its entire population at stake. Third, the US and North Korea are blind to alternative end states to the one they fear/desire. This is how leaders come to see war as the only choice. Finally, the speech undercut any possibility that North Korea would consider making any concession on its nuclear deterrent by underlining that the US will not keep its word even when it has negotiated an agreement with a hostile government.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  the North doesn't want a bomb so much as they want big piles of cash in order to 'stop making a bomb' which they'll continue to make to keep the cash flowing.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-09-27 22:28  

#8  The left see nothing in the world worth fighting for

Sure they do. P*deos, Muslims, trannies in the ladies room and pisiing on the flag, etc.
Posted by: charger   2017-09-27 18:33  

#7  ...may have closed any remaining doors to a diplomatic resolution to this crisis surrounding North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs
Which means exactly what? That we should ♫smile♫ and pay them to screw us again, and again, and again?
Posted by: magpie   2017-09-27 13:54  

#6  The door was never open.

The Norks want a bomb and they want to use it.

The Dems and the perpetual negotiators at DOS are afraid stopping negotiations will end their gravy train.

The Norks will never agree to a halt. This is our last chance to stop it before cities begin to disappear.

The left see nothing in the world worth fighting for.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2017-09-27 10:32  

#5  may have closed any remaining doors to a diplomatic resolution

Gently weighted pocket doors. They shut behind you and apparently no one notices.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-09-27 08:58  

#4  I'd thought 38 North was a reality-based blog.

I was wrong. Apparently
Posted by: Frank G   2017-09-27 08:54  

#3  There were doors open to diplomatic resolution open?

Who knew?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-09-27 07:43  

#2  may have closed any remaining doors to a diplomatic resolution to this crisis surrounding North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs

It is a form of mental disease, isn't it?

Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-09-27 04:42  

#1  I still prefer an 3km asteroid strike.
Posted by: 3dc   2017-09-27 00:44  

00:00