You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
IRS awards multimillion-dollar fraud-prevention no bid contract to Equifax
2017-10-04
[Politico] The IRS will pay Equifax $7.25 million to verify taxpayer identities and help prevent fraud under a no-bid contract issued last week, even as lawmakers lash the embattled company about a massive security breach that exposed personal information of as many as 145.5 million Americans.
Because it isn't graft when WE do it!!
A contract award for Equifax's data services was posted to the Federal Business Opportunities database Sept. 30 ‐ the final day of the fiscal year. The credit agency will "verify taxpayer identity" and "assist in ongoing identity verification and validations" at the IRS, according to the award.

The notice describes the contract as a "sole source order," meaning Equifax is the only company deemed capable of providing the service. It says the order was issued to prevent a lapse in identity checks while officials resolve a dispute over a separate contract.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle blasted the IRS decision.

"In the wake of one of the most massive data breaches in a decade, it’s irresponsible for the IRS to turn over millions in taxpayer dollars to a company that has yet to offer a succinct answer on how at least 145 million Americans had personally identifiable information exposed," Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) told POLITICO in a statement.

The committee's ranking member, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), piled on: "The Finance Committee will be looking into why Equifax was the only company to apply for and be rewarded with this. I will continue to take every measure possible to prevent taxpayer data from being compromised as this arrangement moves forward."

The IRS defended its decision in a statement, saying that Equifax told the agency that none of its data was involved in the breach and that Equifax already provides similar services to the IRS under a previous contract.

"Following an internal review and an on-site visit with Equifax, the IRS believes the service Equifax provided does not pose a risk to IRS data or systems," the statement reads. "At this time, we have seen no indications of tax fraud related to the Equifax breach, but we will continue to closely monitor the situation."

Equifax did not respond to requests for comment.
Equifax should be fined out of existence. Every person's record they lost should be reimbursed $500,000-$1 million, since that is the average cost of lost credit, higher intrest rates and time spent cleaning up the mess these idiots made.
Posted by:DarthVader

#6  I nderstand the contract is suddenly under inspection.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-10-04 23:51  

#5  Ugh:

Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2017-10-04 18:50  

#4  Punishing Equifax = punishing the shareholders. Why? What did they do?

Criminal penalties for the C-level folks are fine, but don't solve the underlying problem. Everyone everywhere has all your data. Now.
Posted by: Iblis   2017-10-04 13:51  

#3   #2 pour encourager les autres
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2017-10-04 13:28  

#2   Equifax should
(1) have fines assessed for damages as mentioned before
(2) have civil lawsuits attached all remaining assets
(3) have illicit stock gains / compensation to their execs clawed back
(4) 1-3 being done, have their corporate charter revoked.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2017-10-04 13:27  

#1  1. Perfect choice. Who knows more about fraud than Equifax!

2. People are focusing on the wrong aspect of the Equifax breach. Yes, they were stupid and incompetent. So what? That data has already been leaked by a dozen companies and government agencies, and it will be leaked again. All your data was available for $10 on the dark web before the Equifax breach. So, the question isn't whether Equifax can be trusted with your data, it's whether anyone can. And if no one can be trusted with it, then why are they allowed to have it?
Posted by: Iblis   2017-10-04 12:06  

00:00